Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rachel is far more qualified than any host on Fox so no. Good point.
Ha, ha, ha!! OMG!!! You're joking, right?
You obviously have no clue about any of the hosts on Fox. You don't know who they are, and you don't know their qualifications. Yet you make this absurd statement.
You obviously have no clue about any of the hosts on Fox. You don't know who they are, and you don't know their qualifications. Yet you make this absurd statement.
You've obviously never watched Maddow. She is hands down the best "talking head" out there bar none.
SP whines abut her interview with Katie. Katie asked SP what publications etc did she read to form her opinions on. SP couldn't answer the question. How was that question a "GOTCHA"?
Every unrehearsed question is a "gotcha" when you don't have three brain cells capable of firing at the same time.
SP whines abut her interview with Katie. Katie asked SP what publications etc did she read to form her opinions on. SP couldn't answer the question. How was that question a "GOTCHA"?
If you have to ask this type of question, you are in the dark.
Do you know how many hours of tape they did? It was edited to make her look bad just as they do with anyone with an R next to their name.
How did you feel when Charlie Gibson asked her how she felt about the "Bush Doctrine" knowing, as you do, that there is really no correct answer to that question.
I have no problem with her asking Sarah Palin that question as long as you ask Biden the same types of questions. And we all knew that wasn't going to happen.
I'll agree that the Bush Doctrine question can fairly be considered a blindside. However, instead of just trying to wing it, she should have just asked pointedly what EXACTLY did Gibson mean by the question?
I think that the McCain/Palin was trying to run so hard away from Ebola Virus (a.k.a. George Bush), that she was horrified at the mention of his name and got flustered.
You obviously have no clue about any of the hosts on Fox. You don't know who they are, and you don't know their qualifications. Yet you make this absurd statement.
Maddow or Vixen
We report...
...You decide!
BTW, Megyn Kelly is an attorney and former prosecutor... and mother.
Ms. P. is dumb. Not curious, not interested in dimensions of issues. A modern day Annie Oakley without a brain. People here in the big land don't like her much. K? are we done?
Any answer she gave was going to be wrong, and I think she tried to calculate in her own mind whether there was a publication she could name that wouldn't set the critics abuzz.
So in her eagerness to avoid saying the wrong thing, she decided to say a nonsensical thing. And this is a woman we should trust to negotiate on the nation's behalf?
Please. "What papers do you read?" is the softest of softball questions and "all of them" is a horrible answer. Basic ability to think on your feet is considered a worthwhile quality in a politician.
Rachel is far more qualified than any host on Fox so no. Good point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob
You are right, Rachel would be much to inquisitive. She would have very pointed and precise questions that would require thought and awareness, to answer. Not a good comparison at all.
Oh yes we can see by the differance inrating how much better the leftist lesbian Maddow is compared to anyone on Fox
Palin, like anyone with any sense, should stay away from the dying MSNBC.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.