Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2010, 07:53 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,306,967 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by africanboy View Post
Rachel is far more qualified than any host on Fox so no. Good point.
Ha, ha, ha!! OMG!!! You're joking, right?

You obviously have no clue about any of the hosts on Fox. You don't know who they are, and you don't know their qualifications. Yet you make this absurd statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2010, 08:13 AM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,811,333 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Ha, ha, ha!! OMG!!! You're joking, right?

You obviously have no clue about any of the hosts on Fox. You don't know who they are, and you don't know their qualifications. Yet you make this absurd statement.
You've obviously never watched Maddow. She is hands down the best "talking head" out there bar none.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 08:22 AM
 
Location: USA - midwest
5,944 posts, read 5,583,949 times
Reputation: 2606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
SP whines abut her interview with Katie. Katie asked SP what publications etc did she read to form her opinions on. SP couldn't answer the question. How was that question a "GOTCHA"?

Every unrehearsed question is a "gotcha" when you don't have three brain cells capable of firing at the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 08:42 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
SP whines abut her interview with Katie. Katie asked SP what publications etc did she read to form her opinions on. SP couldn't answer the question. How was that question a "GOTCHA"?
If you have to ask this type of question, you are in the dark.

Do you know how many hours of tape they did? It was edited to make her look bad just as they do with anyone with an R next to their name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 08:44 AM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanboy View Post
Rachel is far more qualified than any host on Fox so no. Good point.

Opinions are like a..h...s
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 08:45 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
How did you feel when Charlie Gibson asked her how she felt about the "Bush Doctrine" knowing, as you do, that there is really no correct answer to that question.
I have no problem with her asking Sarah Palin that question as long as you ask Biden the same types of questions. And we all knew that wasn't going to happen.
I'll agree that the Bush Doctrine question can fairly be considered a blindside. However, instead of just trying to wing it, she should have just asked pointedly what EXACTLY did Gibson mean by the question?

I think that the McCain/Palin was trying to run so hard away from Ebola Virus (a.k.a. George Bush), that she was horrified at the mention of his name and got flustered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,214,794 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Ha, ha, ha!! OMG!!! You're joking, right?

You obviously have no clue about any of the hosts on Fox. You don't know who they are, and you don't know their qualifications. Yet you make this absurd statement.
Maddow or Vixen



We report...

...You decide!

BTW, Megyn Kelly is an attorney and former prosecutor... and mother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,102,752 times
Reputation: 11535
News Flash

Ms. P. is dumb. Not curious, not interested in dimensions of issues. A modern day Annie Oakley without a brain. People here in the big land don't like her much. K? are we done?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 09:27 AM
 
46,957 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29446
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
Any answer she gave was going to be wrong, and I think she tried to calculate in her own mind whether there was a publication she could name that wouldn't set the critics abuzz.
So in her eagerness to avoid saying the wrong thing, she decided to say a nonsensical thing. And this is a woman we should trust to negotiate on the nation's behalf?

Please. "What papers do you read?" is the softest of softball questions and "all of them" is a horrible answer. Basic ability to think on your feet is considered a worthwhile quality in a politician.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2010, 09:27 AM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,088,985 times
Reputation: 2863
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanboy View Post
Rachel is far more qualified than any host on Fox so no. Good point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
You are right, Rachel would be much to inquisitive. She would have very pointed and precise questions that would require thought and awareness, to answer. Not a good comparison at all.

Oh yes we can see by the differance inrating how much better the leftist lesbian Maddow is compared to anyone on Fox


Palin, like anyone with any sense, should stay away from the dying MSNBC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top