Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Should Obama nationalize the FED, then forgive the debt we would owe ourselves, but pay the other nations holding our debt with a new currency issued directly from the US treasury? (We can throw a few billion at the FED banks as a 'fair' compensation).
"The new book, The Web of Debt, by Ellen Hodgson Brown, Stephen J. Zerlanga’s proposed American Monetary Act, and Paul Grignon’s 47 minute video Money and Debt present a persuasive case for the United States to exercise its sovereignty by creating its own currency, and for the nationalization of the Federal Reserve System."
In the first place, Obama couldn't nationalize the Fed if he wanted to. No President could. It would take an Act of Congress, so that part of the question is moot from the get-go.
In the second place, the answer is ...no. We have a Fed now because of the problems related to a national bank, or the lack thereof, in our history previous to the creation of the Fed. It doesn't exist for no reason, you know?
Should Obama nationalize the FED, then forgive the debt we would owe ourselves, but pay the other nations holding our debt with a new currency issued directly from the US treasury? (We can throw a few billion at the FED banks as a 'fair' compensation).
"The new book, The Web of Debt, by Ellen Hodgson Brown, Stephen J. Zerlanga’s proposed American Monetary Act, and Paul Grignon’s 47 minute video Money and Debt present a persuasive case for the United States to exercise its sovereignty by creating its own currency, and for the nationalization of the Federal Reserve System."
This is a joke, yes? Do you believe in your wildest dreams that Obama could possibly nationalize the Federal Reserve or that he would even want to?
One only needs to look a bit deeper into the prospect, to see that Obama and all of his predecessors have always been working almost exclusively for
the Federal Reserve Bank (and themselves), since its inception. Obama and his cronies, (Geitner, Bernanke, Paulson, et al), would not have the slightest
interest whatsoever, in changing a "winning formula" system that works so well for them, and serves their own selfish ends, a greedy and malevolent
consortium of "money men", who have raped, plundered and pillaged their way through the failed American economy.
American politics, finance and corporations are all engaged in a metaphoric, Ménage à trois, meaning that they are bedfellows who have prostituted
their collective ethics, their morals and even those ideals that they might've had from the start. We get only fuzzy math, spin doctoring and little more than
a smoke and mirror show, when we ask them for an accounting of what it is that they are doing for us. By setting or deciding the value of the dollar, most
everything that the dollar buys is affected. Many are crossing over that line between those who have, to those who have not. Everything that this new brand
of government does, is geared to align America with the New World Order. New government has assumed the mantle of carrying through on the work of the
administration which preceded them. They grow larger by the day adding agencies, departments, czars and chairmen, an ever evolving body that consumes
but does not produce.
How sad it is to feel, that we as a people and a society have reached our zenith, our pinnacle, the crest of our unity, our pride and liberty, only to begin a
rapid slide, down the slippery back slope, of an emerging global mountain.
Here's a link to a real eye-opening video, yes, viewing it will require an open and inquisitive mind but rather than frittering away another two and a half hours
on facebook, farmville or twitter, the viewer will at least arm themselves with a fuller understanding of what is REALLY going on in this changing financial picture,
at this juncture of time.
In the first place, Obama couldn't nationalize the Fed if he wanted to. No President could. It would take an Act of Congress, so that part of the question is moot from the get-go.
In the second place, the answer is ...no. We have a Fed now because of the problems related to a national bank, or the lack thereof, in our history previous to the creation of the Fed. It doesn't exist for no reason, you know?
"It doesn't exist for no reason, you know?" - yes, it exists to create wealth for a few extremely wealthy international bankers - so how does that Fed kool-aid taste?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
