Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2010, 03:51 PM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,529,197 times
Reputation: 1395

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wellwater View Post
The link comes from cnbc, I tend to believe the opposite of what they say so according to that those are the 10 most UNsocialist states in America.
Lol! Exactly!

But then again who watches CNBC?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2010, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booya View Post
Lol! Exactly!

But then again who watches CNBC?
CNBC politically is almost the opposite of MSNBC.
It's basically "Fox News for smart people".
This seems to be very true. Alaska is a petrosocialist state on an almost Venezuelan level.
As for West Virginia: the late Robert Byrd made sure that WV got more than its share of federal money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 04:21 PM
 
243 posts, read 274,842 times
Reputation: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
CNBC politically is almost the opposite of MSNBC.
It's basically "Fox News for smart people".
This seems to be very true. Alaska is a petrosocialist state on an almost Venezuelan level.
As for West Virginia: the late Robert Byrd made sure that WV got more than its share of federal money.
Yep I'm sure you'll run into far more regulations and taxes in Alabama then you will in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 04:24 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,665,061 times
Reputation: 7943
The fact that some people are dismissing it simply because it's on CNBC's website just shows how brainwashed and paranoid they are. If the same exact study was published on the Fox News website, then they'd believe it, I guess.

Numbers are numbers, people. Just because a news story doesn't compliment your view of the world doesn't mean that it's false. Grow up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,711,350 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
The Most Socialist States In America

It's ironic that the former governor of Alaska is one of the most vocal critics of socialism, yet her state is ranked as the second most socialist state in America.

Also interesting that California - the state that is probably the most vilified among free-market conservatives - doesn't even make the top 10.

The full list:

1. West Virginia
2. Alaska
3. Alabama
4. Vermont
5. New Mexico
6. Mississippi
7. Wyoming
8. Arkansas
9. Hawaii
10. Rhode Island
beleive what you want and get your information wherever. You would have trouble getting most to agree with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,447,121 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
Now, wait a minute! What are they trying to pull here and why?

First, they offer a definition of Socialism (which actually the purest form of it, Communism):

"In other words, a purely socialist state is one in which the state is responsible for 100% of economic output and spends all of it on social programs."

Then, they make their determination as to whether or not a state is "socialist" by doing this:

"...we measured total expenditures as a proportion of total economic output to compare the size of the public sector in each state."

Did you catch that little sleight of hand?
Yes - yours.

1. They gave a definition of a "purely socialist state."

2. Then they stated "Since no part of the U.S. can be considered purely socialist, ..." showing that the definition of a "purely socialist state" would have to be modified to apply to individual states. I'm sure you saw it - it was the missing part of your second quote.

The full quote:
"Since no part of the U.S. can be considered purely socialist, we measured total expenditures as a proportion of total economic output to compare the size of the public sector in each state."
The title of the article isn't "Completely socialist states in America" - it's "The most socialist states in America", an accurate title and as far as I can tell, an accurate list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 08:17 PM
 
243 posts, read 274,842 times
Reputation: 131
Their definition of a socialist state differs from mine. Socialism to me means gun banning, atheism, high taxes, red tape, bureucrats, disgusting stuff taught in schools, that's what socialism means to me, and there's lots more of that in Massachusetts, California, Michigan, and New Jersy than there is in Arkansas, Alabama, or Mississippi. But if yall want say they're socialist then fine, this just proves those news statistics really are fixed you can make them say whatever you want. Since what yall are implying is that the most Conservative states are the most "socialist" in your opinion should we switch colors as well red would look better on yall after all it is yall's traditional color.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellwater View Post
Their definition of a socialist state differs from mine. Socialism to me means gun banning, atheism, high taxes, red tape, bureucrats, disgusting stuff taught in schools, that's what socialism means to me, and there's lots more of that in Massachusetts, California, Michigan, and New Jersy than there is in Arkansas, Alabama, or Mississippi. .
Gun banning and atheism have nothing to do with socialism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 10:23 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,665,061 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by wellwater View Post
Their definition of a socialist state differs from mine. Socialism to me means gun banning, atheism, high taxes, red tape, bureucrats, disgusting stuff taught in schools, that's what socialism means to me
And your statement is a great example of how a lot of people who scream about socialism don't even know the meaning of the word.

Socialism | Define Socialism at Dictionary.com

Quote:
Since what yall are implying is that the most Conservative states are the most "socialist" in your opinion should we switch colors as well red would look better on yall after all it is yall's traditional color.
No. Rhode Island and Vermont were on the list of the most socialist states too, and I don't know anyone who thinks of those states as conservative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2010, 03:02 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,526,395 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
Yes - yours.

1. They gave a definition of a "purely socialist state."

2. Then they stated "Since no part of the U.S. can be considered purely socialist, ..." showing that the definition of a "purely socialist state" would have to be modified to apply to individual states. I'm sure you saw it - it was the missing part of your second quote.

The full quote:
"Since no part of the U.S. can be considered purely socialist, we measured total expenditures as a proportion of total economic output to compare the size of the public sector in each state."
The title of the article isn't "Completely socialist states in America" - it's "The most socialist states in America", an accurate title and as far as I can tell, an accurate list.

But, for their final analysis, they make no effort to distinguish between those parts of the economic output which are government controlled and those which are not. They simply lump them together and compare total spending with the total amount, as if all economic output is presumed to be government directed.

If they wanted to be honest about it within the frame they created, they would only compare total spending to the minute amount of the economy which is controlled by the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top