U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: If North Korea again attacks South Korea should the South Attack In Force
yes 31 70.45%
no 5 11.36%
other 3 6.82%
not sure 5 11.36%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Old 04-19-2012, 02:41 PM
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,131 posts, read 28,601,332 times
Reputation: 5454


Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Is there like a choice????
Depands if the missiles are shot down and most of the artillary is taken out with minum losses on the South korean side then conventional weapons would be used.

Now say a major city is hit with a NK nuke then the STARTII no-first strike Nuclear agreement goes out the window and anything goes in terms of the of size and type of force used to strike back.
Quick reply to this message

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top