Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-06-2010, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
$300 billion of that were tax cuts.

Collins and Snowe were also deeply involved with the negotiations, and fought to slide the amount of the stimulus down and the tax cut portion up. Without them the bill would have been blocked.
Obviously, obama now realizes the tax cuts in the Failed Stimulus were not enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:05 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
That is what would have happened. 51 votes are needed (50 with the VP) to pass legislation, but 60 in order to actually hold a final up or down vote. Without Snowe and Collins no up or down vote would have been held on the Stimulus bill.
I asked for you to list bills that WERE filibustered, not ones that magically werent but would have. By your own admission you are talking about a bill that WASNT filibustered and then claiming it was..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,449,121 times
Reputation: 5297
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Whatever the bills final result was, that doesnt mean it was filibustered. The bill PASSED,

A filibuster is when the bill never reaches the floor for a VOTE. By your own admission now the bill wasnt blocked, it was negotiated in the same manner every other bill in america gets passed..
I never said the Stimulus was filibustered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,180 posts, read 19,449,121 times
Reputation: 5297
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I asked for you to list bills that WERE filibustered, not ones that magically werent but would have. By your own admission you are talking about a bill that WASNT filibustered and then claiming it was..
Tax cut bill on bottom 98%
Pay fairness Act
Ending Tax Breaks on Companies that ship jobs overseas
Prohibiting foreign influence on elections
Defense Authorization Act

Those are just since September.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:43 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Your paragraph is from a wikipedia article.

Does that mean Hoover didn't cut taxes like the poster lied about ne did?

Nice diversion from the documented truth. I give you a B+
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,687,243 times
Reputation: 9980
No deal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:50 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,816,250 times
Reputation: 18304
The liberal demopcrats;the special interest of no and give me somethig free; mister.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 05:51 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The top 5% already pay something like 60% of all federal income taxes, and 0bama and the dems want to raise it to what, 65%?

A lot of these so called "rich people" are running small businesses, and they have been hit hard, have had to cut back and even lay off employees, raising their taxes will only cause many of them to increase lay offs, cut back and get even smaller.

Let 0bama fire the 45,000 new federal jobs he created, or reduce the federal budget by the 15% that he increased it by. But no, we need to steal more money from the hard working people instead.


Actually... It goes like this: and this is old
Top 50% of Wage Earners Pay 96.03% of Income Taxes

Only The Rich Pay Taxes Top 50% of Wage Earners Pay 96.03% of Income Taxes
October 10, 2003

There is new data for 2001. The share of total income taxes paid by the top 1% fell to 33.89% from 37.42% in 2000. This is mainly because their income share (not just wages) fell from 20.81% to 17.53%. However, their average tax rate actually rose slightly from 27.45% to 27.50%.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/spc.gif (broken link)
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/top_50__of_wage_earners_pay_96_09__of_income_taxes .Par.0008.ImageFile.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
After 2 years Obama has brought NO hope and NO change.
BAU only he's backing the corporates instead of the war machine

And our embassies have turned into sales offices for them..Spain and GE contract and Brazil and Boeing contract (uncovered thanks to wikileaks)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,752,651 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
Like a lot of Progressives, I've just about had it with President Obama. He's going to cave on this, breaking his campaign promise, just watch. He's turning out to be a weak ineffectual president.



Obama Faces Liberal Revolt over Tax Cut Deal - Political Hotsheet - CBS News


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2KkzsVYUdI
I had it with him before this. This is exactly what I expect from him. He is weak and ineffective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top