Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:31 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,032,070 times
Reputation: 17864

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
How does a deliberate effort to cast doubt translate into an order to tell the full truth?
Another one that never went past the headline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:37 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,582,024 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
How does a deliberate effort to cast doubt translate into an order to tell the full truth? What pretzel logic are you using? Ridiculous! You don't willfully express opposition to something unless you wish to discredit it.
Read the e-mail in question and come back. Despite the media matters headline, all it says is:

"We should refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debate intensifies."

They weren't taking a position or saying that they discredit any position, only pointing out that there are two - after allowing one to present their case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:37 PM
 
5,110 posts, read 7,138,238 times
Reputation: 3116
Quote:
Defending it does nothing for your reputation as well.
I did not make a statement on it. Next time read my comments before posting.

If you have trouble understanding simple sentences, ask for help.

'Climategate' Debunking Gets Less Coverage Than Original Trumped-Up Scandal (VIDEO)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:38 PM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,615,293 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U View Post
This is not a News station it is vehicle for propaganda. Pollution is not helping anything or anyone yet our government allows loopholes so corporations can save a buck or two.


According to the email, obtained by Media Matters, Fox News's Washington bureau chief, Bill Sammon, imposed an order to make time for climate skeptics within 15 minutes of the airing of a story about a scientific report showing that 2000-2009 was on track to be the hottest decade on record.

Fox News chief enforced climate change scepticism
+1 for Fox. I'd rather get my news from someone that is objective enough to avoid the global warming hoax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:44 PM
 
9,888 posts, read 10,820,096 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruthBTold2U View Post
This is not a News station it is vehicle for propaganda. Pollution is not helping anything or anyone yet our government allows loopholes so corporations can save a buck or two.


According to the email, obtained by Media Matters, Fox News's Washington bureau chief, Bill Sammon, imposed an order to make time for climate skeptics within 15 minutes of the airing of a story about a scientific report showing that 2000-2009 was on track to be the hottest decade on record.

Fox News chief enforced climate change scepticism
Media Matters.....................that really is all that needs to be said , but since some might not understand that, Bill Sammon, imposed an order to make time for climate skeptics within 15 minutes of the airing of a story about a scientific report showing that 2000-2009 was on track to be the hottest decade on record. I think that is what is called..... "reporting both sides" ! That is the Fair and Balanced part, you know instead of just running with what ever liberal nonsense is fed to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Northeast
1,377 posts, read 1,053,440 times
Reputation: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
+1 for Fox. I'd rather get my news from someone that is objective enough to avoid the global warming hoax.
If you can not see through the farce that's your problem and thank God not mine.

Last edited by TruthBTold2U; 12-16-2010 at 02:59 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,960 posts, read 22,139,830 times
Reputation: 13795
Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaBMe View Post
Yeah. Next, it will be dubbed, "Climate Weather!" Quick! Run for your raincoats! No! Make it your sunscreen! Oh no! Better grab your snow boots! Oops! Grab your rake! Oh dear, what are we going to do? We can't keep up with it! Better just pass blanket bills that require us to submit to whatever regulation and taxes are necessary to protect us from..."Climate Weather!"
Or better yet "Whatever Climate"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,960 posts, read 22,139,830 times
Reputation: 13795
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
How does a deliberate effort to cast doubt translate into an order to tell the full truth? What pretzel logic are you using? Ridiculous! You don't willfully express opposition to something unless you wish to discredit it.
Not "opposition" but to reserve "doubt" and explain that there are two sides to this issue, as opposed to repeating the al Gore line that "the debate is over", and "the science is settled".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,934,385 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
"We should refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debate intensifies."
This seems like a responsible and reasonable position for a news organization to take. Is this all media blathers has? There they go, making crap up again and the left-wing base just eats it up and regurgitates it verbatim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2010, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Nebuchadnezzar
968 posts, read 2,061,988 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
There they go, making crap up again and the left-wing base just eats it up and regurgitates it verbatim.
That is why we have the right wing base who are thoughtful , fair and balanced , and intelligent .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top