U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support the court's decision to drop the fine against ABC?
Yes. The scene featuring Charlotte Ross was not indecent. 36 94.74%
No. The fine should have remained in place. 2 5.26%
Not sure 0 0%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2011, 01:41 AM
 
26,676 posts, read 27,915,417 times
Reputation: 7938

Advertisements

Quote:
There is nothing indecent about actress Charlotte Ross' rear end. That's the word from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York, which tossed a roughly $1.4 million fine that the Federal Communications Commission had slapped on ABC and some of its affilaites in 2008 for a 2003 episode of the police drama "NYPD Blue" in which Ross' buttocks were visible to viewers.
Court tosses indecency case against ABC's 'NYPD Blue' | Company Town | Los Angeles Times

PTC Condemns Second Circuit Decision to Throw Out NYPD Blue Indecency Fine

Very good news for freedom of speech! Keep in mind that this was George W. Bush's FCC that implemented the fine.

Full clip available for download here:

PTC Video Clips -- Playing: NYPDBlue2-25-03.wmv Click on "Download the clip".

I'm sure the conservative Parents Television Council has the clip there for educational purposes only. (Yeah, right!)

Last edited by AnUnidentifiedMale; 01-06-2011 at 02:02 AM..
Rate this post positively

 
Old 01-06-2011, 01:44 AM
 
2,127 posts, read 1,888,447 times
Reputation: 1010
Honestly I can't think of anything more offensive than the human body. The Vitruvian Man is probably the most disgusting thing I've ever seen.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 02:13 AM
 
Location: Tallahassee
1,869 posts, read 1,057,096 times
Reputation: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunks_galore View Post
Honestly I can't think of anything more offensive than the human body. The Vitruvian Man is probably the most disgusting thing I've ever seen.
lol
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 03:56 AM
 
Location: Harrisonburg, VA
994 posts, read 1,643,889 times
Reputation: 1208
Huh? I don't see a problem?
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 05:04 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
67,710 posts, read 51,767,545 times
Reputation: 39196
Shouldn't there be a poll choice for what a friggin' waste of the court's time? Of course, coming from an administration that had an AG who felt it necessary to drape nude statuary it's hardly surprising. Too bad they didn't find unnecessary wars of choice equally offensive.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 06:41 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,568 posts, read 21,329,204 times
Reputation: 2518
Isn't it the FCC's job to do this???
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,478 posts, read 58,086,765 times
Reputation: 24838
Any society that considers nudity to be more objectionable than pictures of death and destruction (real or imagined) has a very strange set of priorities.

I would find full frontal nudity of men or women in movies or on TV unobjectionable compared to seeing somebody get his brains scattered over a wall on some cop show. The former is entertaining and the latter disgusting. Salacious action is better than murderous. This is difference between good and evil.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 07:42 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,568 posts, read 21,329,204 times
Reputation: 2518
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Any society that considers nudity to be more objectionable than pictures of death and destruction (real or imagined) has a very strange set of priorities.
Quite true.

Quote:
I would find full frontal nudity of men or women in movies or on TV unobjectionable compared to seeing somebody get his brains scattered over a wall on some cop show. The former is entertaining and the latter disgusting. Salacious action is better than murderous. This is difference between good and evil.
Strangely enough,growing up we had TV shows that regularly showed breasts and even had full frontal nudity,all on the 'regular' TV(well actually that is that existed at the time..LOL).

But violence such as commonly seen now didn't exist.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,478 posts, read 58,086,765 times
Reputation: 24838
Where were you watching TV? All we got was Westerns and cop shows.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 01-06-2011, 08:06 AM
 
419 posts, read 851,609 times
Reputation: 375
I've got a big problem with that scene. Where was the studly naked guy? I want something to look at, too!
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top