Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Dont worry, this wont last long. Pretty soon, the government will decide that you cant be trusted to brainwash your child into a genderless collectivist. They'll take and raise the child for you.
Dont worry, this wont last long. Pretty soon, the government will decide that you cant be trusted to brainwash your child into a genderless collectivist. They'll take and raise the child for you.
Dont worry, this wont last long. Pretty soon, the government will decide that you cant be trusted to brainwash your child into a genderless collectivist. They'll take and raise the child for you.
75%+ of the time I have no idea what you're saying, and this is definitely one of those times, but somehow you still manage to make me laugh, ergo.
Thanks!
I used to write briefs for pro se litigants, and the judges had the same problem, but without the humor.
Example:
Judge Jack, you ignorant pr*ck!
When any document is statutorily required to be in the possession of any person, party to any CDA litigation, and that person fails to produce said document when ordered by CDA authority to do so, contumacy is a given.* Thus as in this case where one statute requires a document, and another statute requires it to be submitted, failure to adhere comprises defiance of statutory mandate - twice over.* With regard to the aforesaid, this Board’s acquiescence of statutory detachment abets the failure of the very judiciary machinery upon which this and all other CDA cases rest, and indeed in such manner as to cause subject case to be grounded to estop, subverting any forward judicial progress of this Board’s impartial task of adjudging appellant’s presentment of appeal for proper adjudication of it’s claims against the government.**
Maybe a judge would use a writing similar to this, but addressed to the Governor of Hawaii.
if this was still 1950 then you wouldn't have to change it. that was a world where parents mostly stayed married, families were 90% mom and dad. there were rarely single parents and gays for the most part were in the closet and not raising families. so the standard mother father box to check does not apply to thousands upon thousands of people that live in today's world. thats why.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
