Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You people never stop with this bs. Enough already!!!!
why do you think its BS to talk about a left wrong nut job shouting death to a tea party member.
had that role been reversed you would not be calling BS
why do you think its BS to talk about a left wrong nut job shouting death to a tea party member.
had that role been reversed you would not be calling BS
What would you have said if the roles had been reversed?
What would you have said if the roles had been reversed?
the topic is the death threat in Arizona not what i would do in a hypothetical situation. if you wish to start a thread on hypothetical situations i will be happy to answer
So you believe that we should also censor all news now? Anything that doesn't fit with the liberal party line?
No, he's just expressing exasperation at the fact that prior discussion of the Tucson shooting was closed down during the immediate aftermath, as a temporary measure to allow the board to "cool down". And because the predominance of those discussions seemed to be centered on how political rhetoric, viewed largely to be coming primarily from the "right wing", may be contributing to this type of thing happening, there was a perception that the "liberal" point of view was being "shut down" and/or "censored."
Now that discussion has been re-opened, we get a thread with this kind of unwarranted vitriol directed at "the left", and there's question as to whether this will be "allowed" to remain.
No, he's just expressing exasperation at the fact that prior discussion of the Tucson shooting was closed down during the immediate aftermath, as a temporary measure to allow the board to "cool down". And because the predominance of those discussions seemed to be centered on how political rhetoric, viewed largely to be coming primarily from the "right wing", may be contributing to this type of thing happening, there was a perception that the "liberal" point of view was being "shut down" and/or "censored."
Now that discussion has been re-opened, we get a thread with this kind of unwarranted vitriol directed at "the left", and there's question as to whether this will be "allowed" to remain.
Well said but as you can see none of them are willing to see it.
Oh Well,
Casper
No, he's just expressing exasperation at the fact that prior discussion of the Tucson shooting was closed down during the immediate aftermath, as a temporary measure to allow the board to "cool down". And because the predominance of those discussions seemed to be centered on how political rhetoric, viewed largely to be coming primarily from the "right wing", may be contributing to this type of thing happening, there was a perception that the "liberal" point of view was being "shut down" and/or "censored."
Now that discussion has been re-opened, we get a thread with this kind of unwarranted vitriol directed at "the left", and there's question as to whether this will be "allowed" to remain.
And we now know those accusations were false, don't we?
Unwanted vitriol?
The posting of a huge news story about a shooting victim making death threats to a TP member?
There is not vitriol here, just facts.
It is all over the news headlines today. There is no smearing or lying about it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
