Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2011, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Don't be a cry baby!
1,309 posts, read 1,362,031 times
Reputation: 617

Advertisements

I think true climate change is responsible here. I'm glad they acknowledge that they do not know it all nor do they have all of the answers and didn't claim this is settled science.

Quote:
Such a superstorm is hypothetical but not improbable, climate researchers warn. "We think this event happens once every 100 or 200 years or so,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
They just can't help themselves;

Scientists warn California could be struck by winter ‘superstorm’ - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20110117/us_yblog_thelookout/scientists-warn-california-could-be-struck-by-winter-superstorm - broken link)

Quote:
The risk is gathering momentum now, scientists say, due to rising temperatures in the atmosphere, which has generally made weather patterns more volatile.
What caused such a phenomenon in the past?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
What caused such a phenomenon in the past?
The same thing that would cause it now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,929,215 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
The same thing that would cause it now.
Well, exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Dublin, CA
3,807 posts, read 4,273,534 times
Reputation: 3984
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
You mean they were right?
Who was it that predicted California would slide off into the Pacific.

GOD must not be happy with California.
If God truly wanted to help us, he would only sink San Francisco into the ocean and wipe out Santa Cruz. San Francisco and their totally inane, off the left wing charts of socialism, would not be missed by the masses. Sink it and start all over again, with reasonable politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,247,964 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
This isn't anything new. There are many areas referred to as 100 year flood areas or long term occurrence disaster zones. This is simply a modeling program they are using to attempt to gauge future possible scenarios. While it is guaranteed that eventually another past disaster is likely to occur in the future, there is no certainty in the predictions and their use outside of emergency planning is pointless.
In 1969 southern California experienced a fifty year rainfall. My parents and I had just moved to Huntington Beach, a quarter mile from the surf. The whole area, from mid Orange county down, is on a huge sloup towards the ocean as way back when it was a large bog during the winter as the Santa Ana river whould flood. Before the river was dammed up, in the mountains above OC, it flooded regularly where millions of people lived now.

It rained first in late Septermber. Every day. Then EVERY single day during November, December amd most of February. Its still didn't quit raining into March. I ruined several pairs of boots and discovered it was socks, then plastic bags over socks then boots...

The area where we lived was at sea level with cliffs on either side, one part of Huntington Beach and the other Costa Mesa. There were three bridges up these cliffs, with the river running next to the Costa Mesa side and a runoff channel for flood control on the Huntington Beach side. The HB bridge was the smallest and lowest and got closed first due to the amount of runoff from the stormdrains. The smaller one over the river itself got closed on an off through January and into February when the rain was the hardest. The largeer, taller bridge had water at an inch below. It too would close if it reached a half-inch. Normally it would already be closed but was now the only bridge.

The dam had nearly overflowed and was threatening to constantly, and could easily have been washed out in that event. They were letting out water down the already swollen river to avoid that as it would have flooded half of Orange county. Where I lived would have gotten 12 food of flood waters. We were eligible for federal flood insurance after that based on the staus of the dam and the sand fill in the runoff channels.

The scary part was that if something happened there was litterally no place to go. A flood would have started North of us. If the dam went out the river would have flooded out the bridges. I don't know if we were supposed to swim to the top of the house but at least it was two story.

This was a fifty year rain only because of the dam. Without it it would have been a hundred year rain for us. We hadn't even lived there three months when it first stated raining.

For socal, since there is usually little rain (relative to the norm other places) nothing is built for it. A third of homes flooded sounds like a safe estamiate. And like how the smattering of snow here in OK closed all the schools last week, due to little snow removal equiptment because its not needed often, there is practically no resources in socal to deal with a major flood out.

Yes, this can happen and I wouldn't be surprised it it did. Picture New Orleans times ten with less resources to rescue. People in socal don't have rowboats for getting around in floods. Practically nobody has flood insurence. Bad scene in anyone's estamation. And since it has a solid record of reoccuring in a fairly set time, it will...

Wonder if those areas where flood insurence is available will find more ois being sold or people just ignore the risk as usual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 03:07 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,917,108 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightbird47 View Post
In 1969 southern California experienced a fifty year rainfall. My parents and I had just moved to Huntington Beach, a quarter mile from the surf. The whole area, from mid Orange county down, is on a huge sloup towards the ocean as way back when it was a large bog during the winter as the Santa Ana river whould flood. Before the river was dammed up, in the mountains above OC, it flooded regularly where millions of people lived now.

It rained first in late Septermber. Every day. Then EVERY single day during November, December amd most of February. Its still didn't quit raining into March. I ruined several pairs of boots and discovered it was socks, then plastic bags over socks then boots...

The area where we lived was at sea level with cliffs on either side, one part of Huntington Beach and the other Costa Mesa. There were three bridges up these cliffs, with the river running next to the Costa Mesa side and a runoff channel for flood control on the Huntington Beach side. The HB bridge was the smallest and lowest and got closed first due to the amount of runoff from the stormdrains. The smaller one over the river itself got closed on an off through January and into February when the rain was the hardest. The largeer, taller bridge had water at an inch below. It too would close if it reached a half-inch. Normally it would already be closed but was now the only bridge.

The dam had nearly overflowed and was threatening to constantly, and could easily have been washed out in that event. They were letting out water down the already swollen river to avoid that as it would have flooded half of Orange county. Where I lived would have gotten 12 food of flood waters. We were eligible for federal flood insurance after that based on the staus of the dam and the sand fill in the runoff channels.

The scary part was that if something happened there was litterally no place to go. A flood would have started North of us. If the dam went out the river would have flooded out the bridges. I don't know if we were supposed to swim to the top of the house but at least it was two story.

This was a fifty year rain only because of the dam. Without it it would have been a hundred year rain for us. We hadn't even lived there three months when it first stated raining.

For socal, since there is usually little rain (relative to the norm other places) nothing is built for it. A third of homes flooded sounds like a safe estamiate. And like how the smattering of snow here in OK closed all the schools last week, due to little snow removal equiptment because its not needed often, there is practically no resources in socal to deal with a major flood out.

Yes, this can happen and I wouldn't be surprised it it did. Picture New Orleans times ten with less resources to rescue. People in socal don't have rowboats for getting around in floods. Practically nobody has flood insurence. Bad scene in anyone's estamation. And since it has a solid record of reoccuring in a fairly set time, it will...

Wonder if those areas where flood insurence is available will find more ois being sold or people just ignore the risk as usual.
Even before Katrina I wondered why people would choose to live below sea level and below the level of the Mississippi in New Orleans. Eventually the laws of gravity and nature win. I wonder the same about the area you just described. Doesn't sound like the smartest choice to me to choose to live in a flood zone
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 04:01 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,946,110 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightbird47 View Post
In 1969 southern California experienced a fifty year rainfall. My parents and I had just moved to Huntington Beach, a quarter mile from the surf. The whole area, from mid Orange county down, is on a huge sloup towards the ocean as way back when it was a large bog during the winter as the Santa Ana river whould flood. Before the river was dammed up, in the mountains above OC, it flooded regularly where millions of people lived now.

It rained first in late Septermber. Every day. Then EVERY single day during November, December amd most of February. Its still didn't quit raining into March. I ruined several pairs of boots and discovered it was socks, then plastic bags over socks then boots...

The area where we lived was at sea level with cliffs on either side, one part of Huntington Beach and the other Costa Mesa. There were three bridges up these cliffs, with the river running next to the Costa Mesa side and a runoff channel for flood control on the Huntington Beach side. The HB bridge was the smallest and lowest and got closed first due to the amount of runoff from the stormdrains. The smaller one over the river itself got closed on an off through January and into February when the rain was the hardest. The largeer, taller bridge had water at an inch below. It too would close if it reached a half-inch. Normally it would already be closed but was now the only bridge.

The dam had nearly overflowed and was threatening to constantly, and could easily have been washed out in that event. They were letting out water down the already swollen river to avoid that as it would have flooded half of Orange county. Where I lived would have gotten 12 food of flood waters. We were eligible for federal flood insurance after that based on the staus of the dam and the sand fill in the runoff channels.

The scary part was that if something happened there was litterally no place to go. A flood would have started North of us. If the dam went out the river would have flooded out the bridges. I don't know if we were supposed to swim to the top of the house but at least it was two story.

This was a fifty year rain only because of the dam. Without it it would have been a hundred year rain for us. We hadn't even lived there three months when it first stated raining.

For socal, since there is usually little rain (relative to the norm other places) nothing is built for it. A third of homes flooded sounds like a safe estamiate. And like how the smattering of snow here in OK closed all the schools last week, due to little snow removal equiptment because its not needed often, there is practically no resources in socal to deal with a major flood out.

Yes, this can happen and I wouldn't be surprised it it did. Picture New Orleans times ten with less resources to rescue. People in socal don't have rowboats for getting around in floods. Practically nobody has flood insurence. Bad scene in anyone's estamation. And since it has a solid record of reoccuring in a fairly set time, it will...

Wonder if those areas where flood insurence is available will find more ois being sold or people just ignore the risk as usual.
Yep, in many ways how and where we build can create scenarios that normally wouldn't occur and this is something that people need to be concerned with when they buy/build or move to areas with these possible scenarios, even though uncommon as they are.

As someone mentioned above, Katrina was a perfect example of a known disaster lying in wait and so there should have been extra attention to the key points to which would be in danger of lending to the seriousness of the situation. Unfortunately, those responsible for this were not interested and as a result, both the negligence of those in charge (the city and state) and that of the people who lived there for not making sure the city and state were doing what they were required to do, well... a bad situation became one of extraordinary occurrence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 04:09 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,680,593 times
Reputation: 23295

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H-fh...eature=related
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,717,430 times
Reputation: 8248
help us Governor Moonbeam!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top