Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is sexual preferance a choice?
Yes 47 18.58%
No 193 76.28%
Not sure 11 4.35%
Yes 2 0.79%
Voters: 253. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:31 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Is that an honest question? There are numerous Old and New Testament verses that condemn it. There are also numerous verses that condemn fornication. Since any sexual activity outside of marriage is immoral, it is immoral.
Where did God say two men, or two women, can't marry each other?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:32 PM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,004 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Where did God say two men, or two women, can't marry each other?
Can you give me a Biblical example of such a marriage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:37 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Can you give me a Biblical example of such a marriage?
I'm no Bible expert. I pay it no credence whatsoever.

You're the expert. You're the one who said that homo sex is always immoral since all sex outside marriage is immoral (clearly implying that gay marriage is Biblically forbidden). Where in the Bible does God explicitly forbid gay marriage? I'm just curious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:42 PM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,004 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
I'm no bible expert. I pay it no credence whatsoever.

You're the expert. You're the one who said that homo sex is always immoral since all sex outside marriage is immoral (clearly implying that gay marriage is Biblically forbidden). Where in the Bible does God explicitly forbid gay marriage? I'm just curious.
God instituted marriage by creating Adam and Eve. His model of marriage was male/female. He allowed men to have multiple wives later on in NT times. But nowhere was it ever suggested that it was good for 2 women or 2 men. Homosexuality is explicitly condemned by God in numerous areas, as is adultery or fornication.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:46 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
God instituted marriage by creating Adam and Eve. His model of marriage was male/female. He allowed men to have multiple wives later on in NT times. But nowhere was it ever suggested that it was good for 2 women or 2 men.
So God doesn't specifically forbid it anywhere in the Bible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Homosexuality is explicitly condemned by God in numerous areas
I've had many, many Christians tell me that this is just simply not the case and that people who interpret the Bible this way are misreading it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
God instituted marriage by creating Adam and Eve. His model of marriage was male/female. He allowed men to have multiple wives later on in NT times. But nowhere was it ever suggested that it was good for 2 women or 2 men. Homosexuality is explicitly condemned by God in numerous areas, as is adultery or fornication.
Interesting things about the bible and marriage.

1. The bible never says you've got to go before a priest to get married, ever.

2. The bible never puts limits on one man/one woman marriages. In reality, there are numerous cases of plural marriages in the bible.

3. Some of the bibles greatest heroes had homosexual relationships while being the "voice of God", mainly Solomon and David.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:51 PM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,004 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
So God doesn't specifically forbid it anywhere in the Bible?
I'm not aware of black tar heroin trafficking specifically being prohibited either, but it's certainly not right.

The model of marriage that he instituted was not same-gender.
Quote:


I've had many, many Christians tell me that this is just simply not the case and that people who interpret the Bible this way are misreading it.
They are wrong. Honestly...it's not that difficult to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:53 PM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,402,468 times
Reputation: 8691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
that's exactly it. And it trumps any humanistic morality you may come up with.

It doesn't change. Your's does.
It is absolute. Your's changes.
No. It does change. Or at least, man's interpretation of same changes.

For example, I doubt you read the bible in its original text. Most American protestant sects of Christianity read the KJV, commissioned by the famous bisexual, King James of England.

The bible has been used to decide when and if slavery is moral (HAS to be moral, the bible explicitly CALLS for slavery of some people), and whether or not one can eat shellfish.... wait, seafood lovers everywhere decry the "new covenant" with God... which on its face means that the bible changes and isn't absolute.

And God knows (pun intended) how many books were "left out" of the bible's official final form by the early church!


So no, Calvinist. Your bible isn't absolute. It's not infallible, and your particular strand of belief is not the only strand. You think you're right. Heck, you may KNOW in your "heart" you're right, but it doesn't mean you actually are, because most of the world does NOT subscribe to your particular sect of beliefs, meaning it is very likely you are wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:53 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
I'm not aware of black tar heroin trafficking specifically being prohibited either, but it's certainly not right.

The model of marriage that he instituted was not same-gender.


They are wrong. Honestly...it's not that difficult to see.
And they'd say you're wrong. Again, how can something like this be "absolute" (as you say) if Christians can't even agree on it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2011, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
No. It does change. Or at least, man's interpretation of same changes.

For example, I doubt you read the bible in its original text. Most American protestant sects of Christianity read the KJV, commissioned by the famous bisexual, King James of England.

The bible has been used to decide when and if slavery is moral (HAS to be moral, the bible explicitly CALLS for slavery of some people), and whether or not one can eat shellfish.... wait, seafood lovers everywhere decry the "new covenant" with God... which on its face means that the bible changes and isn't absolute.

And God knows (pun intended) how many books were "left out" of the bible's official final form by the early church!


So no, Calvinist. Your bible isn't absolute. It's not infallible, and your particular strand of belief is not the only strand. You think you're right. Heck, you may KNOW in your "heart" you're right, but it doesn't mean you actually are, because most of the world does NOT subscribe to your particular sect of beliefs, meaning it is very likely you are wrong.
Don't forget that the Catholic bible has 3 more books in it, that the protestant version doesn't contain.

So if the bible is the word of God, why even the change between Catholic and protestant? (this was done because the angelic books lead to a view of more than one heavenly being, which protestants don't like)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top