Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We need to make sure we have this covered for the 2012 election so he does not scam us again.
With many states now working on forcing further proof then a short form photo shopped piece of paper, hopefully we can now force every single person running for this office to produce more information and documents.
I am also for anyone who had locked up their lifelong history and records to not be allowed on any Presidential ballot.
Anyone in this office should have their entire life open for all to see.
The most powerful office in the world needs to clear that no one is hiding anything and records of any kind should not be allowed to be locked.
If you do not believe this then you should not run period.
We deserve to know everything about someone who is a candidate for this office no matter who they are.
Minor V. Happersett explicitly refused to "acknowledge this."
Incorrect. Read the case.
Quote:
Please...provide the exact quotation from the court where this was supposedly "acknowledged."
Read the info that was linked, and research further if you're still not clear on the acknowledged difference between a 'native born' and a 'natural born' citizen.
Even liberal Justice Ginsburg knows that a Constitutionally eligible natural born citizen must have a U.S. citizen father...
Quote:
“Mr. Kneedler, I have a problem with it [Kneedler’s argument]. You would surely have a huge statelessness problem if you didn’t recognize that the child born abroad to U.S. citizens is a U.S. citizen because, as you point out, in most countries in the world, they go by blood, not by land of birth.â€â€”“You call the child born abroad an alien, but in most places in the world that child would NOT be a citizen of the place in which that person is born; isn’t that so?â€
“Well, I thought you said in your brief that in most places, and I think it’s right, they do not go on just solely, they go on parentage.â€
“Mr. Kneedler, If Congress went back to the way it was when everything was determined by the father’s citizenship, go back to before 1934"
I know the case backwards and forward. They explicitly refused to do what you keep insisting they did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
Read the info that was linked, and research further if you're still not clear on the acknowledged difference between a 'native born' and a 'natural born' citizen.
Read it long before you ever posted it. An anecdote in an affidavit is not an acknowledgment by any court of anything.
You didn't listen to the recorded proceedings, huh?
You provided the transcript.
Are you telling me your transcript is a lie and I should listen to the recording instead?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
