Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2011, 11:47 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,111,393 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by flordelis View Post
Not federal pension, state pensions.

Still applies. If Gingrich suggested it, then he should try living without his first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2011, 12:01 PM
 
37 posts, read 323,637 times
Reputation: 67
No one has said what impact State Bankrupcies would have on their ability to get financing in the future for important projects like roads and all the investors (like you?) in their 401(k) Plans that will be killed. There will be a ripple effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 12:18 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by flordelis View Post
Your definition of "know" is everyone else's definition of "make believe", or so it appears from what you have written above. The public employee pensions are consuming state budgets and cannot continue unmodified or there will be NOTHING for ANYONE, pensioneers or otherwise. Nobody is proposing eliminating the pension, your strawman notwithstanding (try wikipedia to learn about that term/tactic), but bringing them in line with sanity is necessary for the state's survival.

In CA, public employees, work for 20 years, retire at 55 and earn up to 150% or more of their annual salary for life, with full medical.

I would suggest that you keep your posts, somewhere close to within the bounds of fact. Just a suggestion, though, you are free to continue to delude yourself and others if you so wish.
Apparently, you have trouble reading.

Did i say "unmodified?" Seems to me that i said the word "renegotiate!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 05:36 PM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
It would seem to me that if Congress believes in cancelling pensions as a way of easing a government's financial burdens they should have the moral decency (In Congress? ) to cancel their own first.
If and when the federal gov't goes bancrupt congressmen will feel the pain also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 05:40 PM
 
59,056 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwruckman View Post
Absolutely not! If a governor refuses to fund or underfunds or defunds, state worker pensions it should be an IMPEACHABLE offense. Peoples Exhib it A is New Jersey Governor Chris Christe.
So, you think a state should go completely broke, fire everybody from the Gov. right down to the janitor so it can pay out it's pension obligation.

Sound like, Give me mine and the hell with the rest of you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2011, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
States chronically underfunded their pension obligations year after year after year.
And here we are today..with a $2.5 Trillion shortfall among states.

So I ask you posters..is it the pensioner's fault that the state underfunded these pensions ?
Is it the pensioner's fault that the state didn't move with the times and up the age + years requirements ?
Is it the pensioner's fault that what money there was in the pension fund was grossly mismanaged with bad investments in RE and CDO's and other RISKY investments ? Is that prudent care by the states ?

The pensioner's should be the LAST to feel the sting. The states should be forced to sell off their assets, change their retirement rules for new employees and/or phase pensions out altogether like the corporate world has and move everyone to the 401K plan.

The pensioners did their time and were promised pensions. Don't get that "mob mentality" against them; they did nothing wrong. If you had a job with the city or state for 20 years and retired you'd be mad right about now as you read of the problems. Mad because your future retirement is on the line here.

The state government is responsible for the pension mess; the city government is responsible for the pension mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top