Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well then...should your opinion hold true, they (network execs) ought to be lining up in an attempt to sign him when he becomes available for the airwaves again...
Are "networks" owned by corporations?
How many "liberal" political talk shows are out there other than on MSNBC? How many on "basic cable"? How many on the free networks?
This has nothing whatsoever to do with censorship. This is a management decision, based on ratings, based on his inappropriate jerkness. There is no right for anyone to have their own radio or TV show.
He'll show up somewhere, at the liberal rags on the net.
But nothing else, just one-sided liberal talking points and lies.
And NOW he has been silenced from the airwaves. Some people seem to live in a very simplistic world with no shades of gray at all.
How do you KNOW it was purely a "management decision"....were you in on the meetings and discussions? Also, how do you know that "management decisions" don't include political considerations? How do you know that the new strategy at MSNBC is not to eventually become a right wing competitor with FOX. The FACT IS that you absolutely do not know of your own direct knowledge what was involved in the decision.
Olbermann was too anti-corporatist. Too anti-Republicans, too anti **** Industries, etc., etc., etc. Did someone say that the person running comcast or owning comcast is a REPUBLICAN?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.