Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2011, 12:57 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
I feel that way at times too.

However, with the global economy, common sense does not support it.
In that other thread "Founding Father's Socialist" (or whatever it is) a little research would reveal that they formed those government sponsored hospitals for sailors because they quickly realized the US government was "deeply dependent on foreign commerce."

Sailors’ Health and National Wealth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2011, 01:08 PM
 
5,546 posts, read 9,999,979 times
Reputation: 2799
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
More importantly Isolationism is giving up. It's throwing in the towel and allowing us to go into free-fall. The only thing that could cause mass hysteria even faster would be for a god to come down from the sky or an electromagnetic pulse attack from about 350 miles above the earth over the US.

It would pretty much be the worse case scenario. You'd see governments start to collapse everywhere and to stop that collapsing those governments would become very adventurous which would spark World War IV which would be a war far different from the previous one where we held the only atomic bombs.
Ok, please explain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
I can't think of any other reason, in which case he is sure not the guy I voted for.


Got oil?

When did we get oil?

I'm paying over three dollars per gallon for gas. They can bust out with that Bush oil anytime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 01:41 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,706,419 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
I disagree. I don't think we should be ANYWHERE in any other country but our own. We have enough problems here as things stand. Shouldn't we look after our own backyard before we go poking our nose over our neighbor's fence and criticizing the weeds over there?
You're not alone in that isolationist view, and it's even been attempted a few times, but the reality is we live in a global society and problems overseas are problems here and vice versa. Just look at how our mortgage crisis rippled through the world.

As they look at spending cuts, I'd certainly be in favor of considering drawing down in Germany, Japan, et al, but it's far too soon in Iraq. As Obama said, we're going to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 01:47 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
You're not alone in that isolationist view, and it's even been attempted a few times, but the reality is we live in a global society and problems overseas are problems here and vice versa. Just look at how our mortgage crisis rippled through the world.

As they look at spending cuts, I'd certainly be in favor of considering drawing down in Germany, Japan, et al, but it's far too soon in Iraq. As Obama said, we're going to be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in.
You say tomato and I say tomato. Some people call people who do not want to get into or stay in unnecessary wars isolationist. Others call them anti-interventionalist. Of which, I am one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 01:52 PM
 
11,155 posts, read 15,706,419 times
Reputation: 4209
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
You say tomato and I say tomato. Some people call people who do not want to get into or stay in unnecessary wars isolationist. Others call them anti-interventionalist. Of which, I am one.
i strongly opposed the unnecessary Iraq war. It's naive, however, to treat it like a game and just walk away on principle. We overturned their government, ended combat operations, and are now on a peace-keeping mission as they rebuild.

Seems pretty reasonable, from both a U.S. self-interest and an altruistic perspective, once you accept the fact that we already mucked it up in there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 01:57 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
i strongly opposed the unnecessary Iraq war. It's naive, however, to treat it like a game and just walk away on principle. We overturned their government, ended combat operations, and are now on a peace-keeping mission as they rebuild.

Seems pretty reasonable, from both a U.S. self-interest and an altruistic perspective, once you accept the fact that we already mucked it up in there.
The first question you must ask is under what circumstances will it be acceptable for us to leave. IF the answer is when the country can stand on its own with stability of government, then we will be in both countries for at least another 50 years. Most honest experts will tell you that.

We simply cannot afford to stay another 5 years much less 50. It is simply not practical. We may as well fold tents now instead of folding tents 10 years from now after we spend...literally trillions of dollars and receive the same results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 02:08 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
Ok, please explain.
Would you rather China or Russia control the last little bit of mineral wealth on the planet? For us to not have any influence at all in where it goes and for what it's used for?

If you want an isolationist policy then that is exactly what you're moving towards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,312,803 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
I, for one, would like to know how this poster knows what stocks Michael Moore owns and then I would like to see a link.
It's actually old news, from quite a few years back...

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...aliburton.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 02:15 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
The first question you must ask is under what circumstances will it be acceptable for us to leave. IF the answer is when the country can stand on its own with stability of government, then we will be in both countries for at least another 50 years. Most honest experts will tell you that.

We simply cannot afford to stay another 5 years much less 50. It is simply not practical. We may as well fold tents now instead of folding tents 10 years from now after we spend...literally trillions of dollars and receive the same results.
Actually we cannot afford not to.

Quote:
Bauxite and Alumina and Aluminum.—In 2008, Russia was the leading individual producer of aluminum in the whole region, with nearly three times as much production as Germany, which was the second ranked producer. Russia and Kazakhstan accounted for the majority of bauxite production in the region, although production was significantly below that of the world’s leading producers
Quote:
Copper.—In 2008, Central Eurasia was the region’s main producer of copper ore, and the EU was the leading producer of refined copper. Russia and Kazakhstan, in order of amount produced, accounted for the majority of copper ore production.
Quote:
Gold.—In 2008, Europe and Central Eurasia accounted for about 16.6% of world gold production; the majority of gold production in the region came from Central Eurasia. The principal producers, by volume, were Russia, which produced 176,347 kilograms (kg), Uzbekistan (85,000 kg), and Kazakhstan (22,000 kg)
Quote:
Iron and Steel.—Europe and Central Eurasia produced about 23.9% of world crude steel output and 18% of pig iron and direct-reduced iron output in 2008. The EU produced about 62% of crude steel in the region, but Russia was the leading individual producer with 68.7 Mt followed by Germany (45.8 Mt), Ukraine (37.1 t), and Italy (30.6 Mt).
Quote:
Iron Ore.—Europe and Central Eurasia produced 11.6% of the world’s iron ore in 2008. Central Eurasia was the dominant producer of iron ore in the region. Russia, Ukraine, Sweden, and Kazakhstan were the leading iron ore producers in the region, accounting for a combined production of 126 Mt in 2008.
Quote:
Nickel.—Production of the region’s mine output of nickel was almost entirely the result of Russian mining activity, and refined nickel production took place mainly in Russia and Western Europe. Russia accounted for about 26% of nickel mine output and 51% of nickel refinery production in the region in 2008
Quote:
Platinum-Group Metals.—Within the region of Europe and Central Eurasia, almost all platinum-group metal (PGM) mining took place in Russia, although small amounts of PGMs were also mined in Finland, Poland, and Serbia.
Quote:
Zinc.—Europe and Central Eurasia produced about 12.8% of the world’s mine output of zinc and about 23.8% of world zinc metal output in 2008.
Quote:
Coal.—In 2008, Europe and Central Eurasia accounted for 60.1% of lignite production, 10.7% of world bituminous coal production, and 5.6% of world anthracite production.
Quote:
Uranium.—In 2008, Central Eurasia accounted for more than 36% of world uranium production. Kazakhstan produced 10,049 t; Russia 4,152 t, and Uzbekistan 2,757 t. Uranium mining took place in several other countries in the region (the Czech Republic, Germany, and Ukraine), but in smaller quantities (table 22).
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pu...pe-eurasia.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top