Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:04 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,337,915 times
Reputation: 11538

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac_Muz View Post
I don't believe we have hit close to the bottom.................yet.
Nope....wait until the extended unemployment stops.

And someday it will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
i see this as a cycle that we started around 1980. that's when we started all these policies designed to increase public debt, mortgage debt, student loan debt, credit card debt, et cetera.
Can't argue against that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I wasn't aware that it took five years after the crash in 1929 to be seen as a financial disaster of mega-proportions. I'm pretty sure politicians weren't finding support for claiming... "the fundamentals of American economy are strong" even couple of years down the road.

But in reality, I see this current debacle only an effect of the economic health of the nation since the recession of 2001. It simply never recovered.
Oh yes they were. Plenty more. It was confidence building I'm sure.
And the quick depression that happened years before was over before you know it. They were going on past history with their prediction IMHO.
I think I was off though..4 years, not 5 sorry.

The 4-Year Cycle | Tim Wood | Safehaven.com
December 5, 1929
"The Government's business is in sound condition." -- Andrew W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury

June 9, 1931
"The depression has ended." - Dr. Julius Klein, Assistant Secretary of Commerce.

Great Depression 1929 Quotes & Statements | Commodity Trading & Trend Following
"Stabilization at [present] levels is clearly possible."
- HES Oct 31, 1931 (Harvard Economic Society)

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S."
- President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933 (June 1933)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,448,604 times
Reputation: 6541
The only difference between a recession and a depression is the severity and the duration. If the GDP drops by 10% or more and it lasts for more than 3 or 4 consecutive years, then it is a depression. If the GDP drop is less severe and lasts less time, then it is a recession. Otherwise, there is no difference between the two.

These are arbitrary and subjective values attributed to a "recession" in 1975 by the New York Times in order to distinguish it from a "depression." The reality is that both mean the same thing and can be used interchangeably, but most have been indoctrinated to believe that a depression is more severe than a recession.

The current recession is not nearly as severe or as long lasting as the 1974-1984 recession.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:15 PM
 
168 posts, read 307,909 times
Reputation: 181
i cant call this a depression. people still line up for the newest i phone. not bread lines. times are tough, i wont deny it. times are tough for my family, but this isnt a depression yet. maybe if it keeps going down hill, and if people dont adjust their lifestyle to meet their needs, it will be a depression some day. ok gotta go, my bank account is low. i have to go get a new credit card.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I wasn't aware that it took five years after the crash in 1929 to be seen as a financial disaster of mega-proportions. I'm pretty sure politicians weren't finding support for claiming... "the fundamentals of American economy are strong" even couple of years down the road.

But in reality, I see this current debacle only an effect of the economic health of the nation since the recession of 2001. It simply never recovered.
Yes, remember it was a "jobless recovery".
We now find out that debt a/k/a "credit" was made loose and available so many went way too far into debt to live. Our problems were brewing way before 2007. And if you look..the debt is just going through the system hitting each area as they no longer can borrow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:17 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,634,135 times
Reputation: 3870
Well... I just wonder how a sizable segment of the population will react to being told, more or less, "Hey - we don't need you anymore to run the country's economy. You're dead weight. You bring nothing to the table and we've got nothing for you, except some patchy welfare programs."

I can't imagine that this will go over very well, especially when it gets applied to people who used to be productive members of the workforce, often for decades on end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
The only difference between a recession and a depression is the severity and the duration. If the GDP drops by 10% or more and it lasts for more than 3 or 4 consecutive years, then it is a depression. If the GDP drop is less severe and lasts less time, then it is a recession. Otherwise, there is no difference between the two.

These are arbitrary and subjective values attributed to a "recession" in 1975 by the New York Times in order to distinguish it from a "depression." The reality is that both mean the same thing and can be used interchangeably, but most have been indoctrinated to believe that a depression is more severe than a recession.

The current recession is not nearly as severe or as long lasting as the 1974-1984 recession.
Does government spending right before GDP numbers count ?
Cash for clunkers, big tax credits for homes, appliances, etc.
All right before GDP reporting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Oh yes they were. Plenty more. It was confidence building I'm sure.
And the quick depression that happened years before was over before you know it. They were going on past history with their prediction IMHO.
I think I was off though..4 years, not 5 sorry.

The 4-Year Cycle | Tim Wood | Safehaven.com
December 5, 1929
"The Government's business is in sound condition." -- Andrew W. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury

June 9, 1931
"The depression has ended." - Dr. Julius Klein, Assistant Secretary of Commerce.

Great Depression 1929 Quotes & Statements | Commodity Trading & Trend Following
"Stabilization at [present] levels is clearly possible."
- HES Oct 31, 1931 (Harvard Economic Society)

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S."
- President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933 (June 1933)
And in fact, the great depression did end in 1933. But, Andrew Mellon wouldn't be someone I would consider a politician. His premise does sound a lot like McCain in late 2008. And as I said earlier, I doubt he had supporters then. Or, may be he did. I saw plenty of support for McCain's idea of US economy at the time, right here at C-D.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,813,019 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Does government spending right before GDP numbers count ?
Cash for clunkers, big tax credits for homes, appliances, etc.
All right before GDP reporting.
And why shouldn't it? (If that is the premise of your argument)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top