Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2011, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,820,869 times
Reputation: 7801

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
"Drugged, raped, and pregnant? Too bad. Republicans are pushing to limit rape and incest cases eligible for government abortion funding."

"The 'No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act'...contains a provision that would rewrite the rules to limit drastically the definition of rape and incest in these cases. With this legislation...Republicans propose that the rape exemption be limited to "forcible rape." This would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape."

The House GOP's Plan to Redefine Rape | Mother Jones


I don't understand how any women could possibly vote Republican.
Rape=what the Democrats have done to us over the last 2 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2011, 11:34 AM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,523,211 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
why would anyone vote for the fascist liberal

they hate the middleclass..all thier policies have destroyed the middleclass

they hate the poor.. all their policies keep the poor in poverty

they hate children

liberals are a cancer to society
From my point of view I see that the republicans are doing that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2011, 06:14 PM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,731,412 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
"Drugged, raped, and pregnant? Too bad. Republicans are pushing to limit rape and incest cases eligible for government abortion funding."

"The 'No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act'...contains a provision that would rewrite the rules to limit drastically the definition of rape and incest in these cases. With this legislation...Republicans propose that the rape exemption be limited to "forcible rape." This would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape."

The House GOP's Plan to Redefine Rape | Mother Jones


I don't understand how any women could possibly vote Republican.
The republicans are buying trouble they don't need. It doesn't matter how they try to tailor language to allow federal funding for abortions in certain extreme cases they will be attacked by the pro-abortion forces. They ought to stand on principle and simply ban federal funding for all abortions, period. And the principle is not difficult to articulate: abortion is murder, in all cases, and federal taxpayers ought not be paying for murder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2011, 06:36 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 36,976,499 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
The republicans are buying trouble they don't need. It doesn't matter how they try to tailor language to allow federal funding for abortions in certain extreme cases they will be attacked by the pro-abortion forces. They ought to stand on principle and simply ban federal funding for all abortions, period. And the principle is not difficult to articulate: abortion is murder, in all cases, and federal taxpayers ought not be paying for murder.
Without sounding like a troll, how do you feel about the wars we are currently, and may be in the near future, involved in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2011, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,102,305 times
Reputation: 21239
Redefine rape?

So, from now on will it be "Assault with a friendly weapon?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2011, 11:30 AM
 
4,559 posts, read 4,095,995 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Why would any reasonable family oriented, hardworking person vote Democrat in this day and age.
because they actually want to get paid for their work, not limp along paycheck to paycheck because management wants the workers hard earned money to go to stock dividends or CEO bonuses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2011, 11:48 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,910,955 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Exactly! That is what they are going after.
Bull feathers. It doesn't stop abortion mills like Planned Parenthood from operating except sans government funding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2011, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,554,677 times
Reputation: 14862
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Bull feathers. It doesn't stop abortion mills like Planned Parenthood from operating except sans government funding.
Sorry, but are you aware that abortion accounts for only 3% of Planned Parenthood's services?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2011, 01:15 PM
 
270 posts, read 522,326 times
Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Rape=what the Democrats have done to us over the last 2 years.
Oh, that's gonna offend people. Here we go again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2011, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Hades
2,126 posts, read 2,380,741 times
Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Rape=what the Democrats have done to us over the last 2 years.
Rape- when an individual is forcibly assaulted sexually. Incest- when that forcible assault is by a family member.

I suggest you work on your language aptitude.

The discussion at hand already deals with something sick enough. DO NOT equate some bipartisan boo hoo with a what a victim of rape or incest experiences.

More to the point of the OP, we can discuss WHY such measures are being considered. WHY a pregnant girl or woman who has suffered rape or incest should not have the option of abortion. If we are going to require that all children be born, even if it is out of incest or rape, we need to simultaneously discuss hardcore psychological help programs for these families because the child will be likely growing up in trauma from day one. Ok, not a reason to abort but don't ignore the fact that the family or individual circumstance will be extremely traumatic and often can even end up in the child being passed through the foster care system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top