Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:07 AM
 
1,811 posts, read 1,209,974 times
Reputation: 503

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"Jimmy Carter will go down in American history as "the president who lost Iran," which during his term went from being a major strategic ally of the United States to being the revolutionary Islamic Republic. Barack Obama will be remembered as the president who "lost" Turkey, Lebanon and Egypt, and during whose tenure America's alliances in the Middle East crumbled. The superficial circumstances are similar. In both cases, a United States in financial crisis and after failed wars loses global influence under a leftist president whose good intentions are interpreted abroad as expressions of weakness. The results are reflected in the fall of regimes that were dependent on their relationship with Washington for survival, or in a change in their orientation, as with Ankara."

Obama will go down in history as the president who lost Egypt - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

The article goes on to say that at least Jimmy Carter preached human rights and Obama's predecessor George W Bush made blunt calls for democracy and freedom where as Obama thinks the main problem in the Middle East is Israeli occupation. His failure in that area made him back off and concentrate on preventing Israel and Iran from going to war.

There's a lot more in the article about whether Obama could do anything. To be fair, I heard a few people on Fox News say Obama is handling what's happening in Egypt now, correctly and this article is more about the lead up to what's going on now, in Egypt.
I believe the ink is drying as we speak on that chapter of history. Just like Carter lost Iran.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
It is ALWAYS only a matter of time a horrible foreign policy comes back to bite us in the back. It did with Cuba, it did with Iran, it did with Iraq, it did with Afghanistan, it is doing with Pakistan. Add Egypt and Yemen to that count.

And, Israel should be scared, very scared. A free Egypt is not in its best interest.
Why should the Israelis fear a free Egypt, will the Egyptian people launch a war on Israel?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:09 AM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,193,095 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guamanians View Post
Israel might get testy and launch a pre-emptive strike. :
Israel launch a nuclear first strike at Egypt, a nation on its own border with a capital just to the west a few miles? BUAHAHAHAHAHA yeah, there wouldn't be any fallout carried on the winds that would blow it right back into Israel. I kind of doubt the Israeli's are that stupid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
The United States should only intervene in Israeli foreign policy when another country declares war on Israel. Then, as their ally, we would help to defend Israel.

Terrorism is a police matter. Let Israel worry about its own borders and security.
What happens if Israel declares war on another nation, are we still obligated to come charging to their rescue to pull their fat out of the fire? I mean Turkey for instance is a NATO ally and Israel isn't, by treaty we would be obligated to fight on behalf of Turkey against Israel. Not that it would ever happen but just pointing out that things aren't really as clear as they first appear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:12 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guamanians View Post
so you think that the US should sit back and let terrorists take over? Read your statement... that is what you are saying.
And your solution would be what?

Another ineffective invasion/occupation of a sovereign nation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:13 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
I believe the ink is drying as we speak on that chapter of history. Just like Carter lost Iran.
Lost? Have you tried Google Earth? Iran is right where it's always been
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:21 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The enemies of our allies are taking notes to see how to overthrow a government. If it is as easy as starting riots in the streets, to get 0bama to abandon his allies, look for more of the same.
The enemies of our allies???

The people of Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, are our enemies?

That is the kind of screwed up thinking that makes allies into enemies.

Perhaps had the U.S. chosen wisely during the Iranian revolution, Iran would not be our "enemy" today, something that could be applied to a number of other countries, most notably, Vietnam, and any number of Latin and South American countries as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
7,835 posts, read 8,439,670 times
Reputation: 8564
No. Any other stupid questions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
A Egypt free of outside control and operating as a free republic is in everyone's best interest. We should use our doplomatic influence to help that end. We should keep our Army at home.

Egypt, like the other countries in the world, was never ours to lose. We are NOT entirely corporations and financiers. Their fate is dependant on their own business skills and, AFAIAC, are on their own.
I think you missed the context of want is meant by "losing" Egypt, we may well be losing Egypt as an ally in the world.

What is, or has been, 0bama's relationship with the Egyptian people and Mubarak, and how do the Egyptian people interpret it?

Have the people of Egypt formed the opinion that 0bama has been fully supportive of Mubarak, while ignoring the plight of the people, or do they think the the US has been highly critical of the dictator-like manner in which Mubarak has been suppressing the people?

It's important to the Egyptians whether or not our president supports them, or if he will just support whoever is in control of their country. Being a supporter of freedom and basic human rights, means you support what is in the best interest for the people, not just supporting the current thug in control over them. Mubarak was not what was best for the people of Egypt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
The enemies of our allies???

The people of Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, are our enemies?

That is the kind of screwed up thinking that makes allies into enemies.

Perhaps had the U.S. chosen wisely during the Iranian revolution, Iran would not be our "enemy" today, something that could be applied to a number of other countries, most notably, Vietnam, and any number of Latin and South American countries as well.
did i say "the people of Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, are our enemies"? No, I did not. Now try to think before you go off on a rant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2011, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffington View Post
I believe the ink is drying as we speak on that chapter of history. Just like Carter lost Iran.
Let me ask you since Laura has declined to answer:

If you are willing to place blame, then are you willing to give credit? If Egypt gains a moderate president through democratic elections, then will you say that Obama goes down as the president who brought democracy to Egypt? Will you do that, or will you only blame him in case it turns ugly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top