Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:10 PM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,407,529 times
Reputation: 6388

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Obama's State of the Union address: Criticism of the Supreme Court campaign finance ruling | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times

“Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign companies -- to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said tonight. “Well, I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, and worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.”

The court’s ruling overturned a century-old restriction. In a 5-4 decision led by the court’s conservative bloc, the justices said that corporations had the same right to free speech as individuals, and for that reason the government could not stop corporations from spending to help their favored candidates. Many analysts predict the ruling will benefit Republicans in next fall’s midterm elections.
The huge edge fashioned by Democrats out of union political money is now offset by the voice of free enterprise...which is the sole source of wealth in America. This is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:14 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Obama's State of the Union address: Criticism of the Supreme Court campaign finance ruling | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times

“Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests -- including foreign companies -- to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said tonight. “Well, I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, and worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.”

The court’s ruling overturned a century-old restriction. In a 5-4 decision led by the court’s conservative bloc, the justices said that corporations had the same right to free speech as individuals, and for that reason the government could not stop corporations from spending to help their favored candidates. Many analysts predict the ruling will benefit Republicans in next fall’s midterm elections.
What, you think unions and organizations like ACORN are entitled to take part in the political process, but not other entites like corporations?
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
The huge edge fashioned by Democrats out of union political money is now offset by the voice of free enterprise...which is the sole source of wealth in America. This is a good thing.
Its a very good thing, which makes watching the left cry and squeal because they think legal entities shouldnt exercise their legal rights!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:39 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
The huge edge fashioned by Democrats out of union political money is now offset by the voice of free enterprise...which is the sole source of wealth in America. This is a good thing.
Except when free enterprise begins to outsource... thereby destroying the wealth of the middle class...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:47 PM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,362,653 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Except when free enterprise begins to outsource... thereby destroying the wealth of the middle class...
So getting back to NAFTA, why do you suppose Clinton pushed it through to begin with, knowing it would export jobs to Mexico? Evil intent, or plain old incompetence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:48 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.C View Post
So getting back to NAFTA, why do you suppose Clinton pushed it through to begin with, knowing it would export jobs to Mexico? Evil intent, or plain old incompetence?
U.S., Canada and Mexico... not China and India... common sense...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:53 PM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,362,653 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
U.S., Canada and Mexico... not China and India... common sense...
China and India? What do they have to do with NAFTA???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:55 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.C View Post
China and India? What do they have to do with NAFTA???
Exactly... why all the outsourcing and manufacturing to China and India?...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 02:58 PM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,362,653 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
Exactly... why all the outsourcing and manufacturing to China and India?...
Oh I get it - you're saying that repealing NAFTA would stop outsourcing to China and India, even though they're not NAFTA trade partners. Interesting theory...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 04:02 PM
 
5,346 posts, read 4,046,385 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.C View Post
Oh I get it - you're saying that repealing NAFTA would stop outsourcing to China and India, even though they're not NAFTA trade partners. Interesting theory...
No... NAFTA is not being utilized at all... maybe a good thing... so why outsource to China and India...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 04:46 PM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,362,653 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475 View Post
No... NAFTA is not being utilized at all... maybe a good thing... so why outsource to China and India...
Oh, so NAFTA does not need to be repealed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top