Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2011, 01:59 PM
 
6,757 posts, read 8,306,255 times
Reputation: 10152

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Making statements without reading the article makes you loose any cediability you might have had,

According to the article, "That purchase was legal"
I read the article, and I quote:

Quote:
The investigators participating in the mayor’s videotaped episode bought three guns, two of them after telling the Arizona sellers that they probably could not pass a federal background check. Such checks are not required for private sales, but private sellers are forbidden from selling to people they reasonably suspect could not pass a federal background check.
So if someone says to you, "I probably couldn't pass the background check anyway", isn't that reasonable suspicion?

I feel that I am not loosing [sic] cediability [sic].
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2011, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,339,310 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Your statement is wrong. Go back and read the article.
Pay attention.

From the NYT article:

Aides to the mayor said that private detectives who were former law enforcement officers carried out the video investigations, not current police officers.

You can not obtain or hold a license as a private detective if you can not pass a background check.

Capisci?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:00 PM
 
6,757 posts, read 8,306,255 times
Reputation: 10152
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yep, and HOW is this NOT entrapment?
They were not acting in the capacity of law enforcement officers; they were gathering information. Since no arrest was possible, it is not entrapment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:03 PM
 
6,757 posts, read 8,306,255 times
Reputation: 10152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
That is not necessarily true, here in the State of NC in a private sell the law states that in a private sell the seller must conform to the laws that the buyer can possess a firearm. So private buys aren't a free for all. Does it happen, sure it does...but overall law abiding responsible firearm owners don't sell to thugs, etc.... It just simply doesn't happen.

You can't sell firearms on CL or anything of the like. You can sell them on the internet but they have to be shipped to an FFL dealer.

You are trying to paint to wide of strokes with your brush and it just isn't so.
I think the biggest problem is that gun laws are not even across the country. In Arizona, you can easily buy an arsenal at gun shows without ever passing a background check. I don't think that should be possible, but I'm not sure how we'd go about stopping it without forbidding private sales. Do we want to go that far? I don't think so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:04 PM
 
6,757 posts, read 8,306,255 times
Reputation: 10152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
It is NOT a loophole. People selling private property whether a gun or a knife piece of furniture do NOT have to follow the same rules a licensed dealer.

Emphasis on private property.
When I sell my car, I have to follow the law. I don't see why guns should be any different. Private property or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,545,473 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emeraldmaiden View Post
I think the biggest problem is that gun laws are not even across the country. In Arizona, you can easily buy an arsenal at gun shows without ever passing a background check. I don't think that should be possible, but I'm not sure how we'd go about stopping it without forbidding private sales. Do we want to go that far? I don't think so.
If you attend a gun show in ANY State and you purchase through an FFL dealer, you have to complete a 4473 and dealers are encouraged to run the buyer through a NICS check. There is no way around the 4473 with a FFL holder.

Again, responsible firearms owners don't play by the rules that are being layed out here. They have a sense of pride (for lack of a better word) to not
do anything to tarnish the rights of the 2A.

The ones who would sell to any average joe, could careless about any laws, regulations etc.....and you will never be able to legislate morality. And that is what it boils down to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:18 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,360 posts, read 26,558,708 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emeraldmaiden View Post
I read the article, and I quote:



So if someone says to you, "I probably couldn't pass the background check anyway", isn't that reasonable suspicion?

I feel that I am not loosing [sic] cediability [sic].
Not quite that simple. The NICS records are so hopelessly poor that people routinely get denied wrongly, then have to go through a costly/invasive/lengthy appeals process. There's also delays and a 3 day delay could mean the gun show is over first...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,360 posts, read 26,558,708 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emeraldmaiden View Post
I think the biggest problem is that gun laws are not even across the country. In Arizona, you can easily buy an arsenal at gun shows without ever passing a background check. I don't think that should be possible, but I'm not sure how we'd go about stopping it without forbidding private sales. Do we want to go that far? I don't think so.
Such laws only impact the law abiding. The criminals would continue to buy and sell when and where and how they wish, and you'd never know about it. I could go out right now and sell a gun to someone if I wanted to, and who would know I did it? You can't have police watching our every move, so such a law would be worthless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:25 PM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,924,684 times
Reputation: 1564
If I ever sell one of my guns, it will be through a local gun shop that handles consignment sales unless I happen to know the buyer. I've bought and sold guns with friends and family without checking their driver's license to determine if they meet residency requirements - I'll admit that. I didn't ask if they had any felonies that would prevent them from owning a gun.

Yes there is a small percentage of people who don't care who they sell a gun to. I don't think that a registry will help. A criminal will remove the serial number if they don't want it traced back to their supplier. It takes 30 seconds to do that. What about guns that have changed hands many time? I have some Rugers from the mid '60's that have probably had a dozen owners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2011, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Near the water
8,237 posts, read 13,545,473 times
Reputation: 3899
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Not quite that simple. The NICS records are so hopelessly poor that people routinely get denied wrongly, then have to go through a costly/invasive/lengthy appeals process. There's also delays and a 3 day delay could mean the gun show is over first...
NICS records poor? Not hardly....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top