Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2011, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,817 posts, read 19,355,726 times
Reputation: 9616

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacific Swell View Post
I'd like to know what Tea People and Rush fans think about his support for that tyrant Mubarak. You guys have been complaining that Obama is a tyrant since he's been in office, yet you don't seem to have a problem with tyranny in other nations including Egypt.

I bet if the Obama administration was in favor of Mubarak staying in power, guys like Rush would be saying the opposite. Rush would be saying that Obama supports dictators.
Actually since democracies are mod rule...the real question is why are the liberals who claimed that we shouldnt have removed the dictator of saddam husain, in iraq, all supportive of removing this dictator, and alowing even worse to come in with the Muslim brotherhood, and sharia law


example; while Egypt might be a frying pan right now with a dictator.. the fire would be the radical Muslim brotherhood



pick a winner...do we really want to chance going from the fryingpan to the fire???


yes there are alot of assumptions

but as they say..."the devil you know, as opposed to the devil you dont know"


it is similar (not exactly the same but similar) to Iran... the shah was a dictator,, loved by some hated by some....but the ayatollahs(sp?) are far worse

just because the 'people' vote -- mob rule-- a democracy...doesn’t mean it’s always a good thing....the majority wanted and continued slavery here in the usa for nearly 100 years before it was abolished
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2011, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,230 posts, read 17,779,642 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
Actually since democracies are mod rule...the real question is why are the liberals who claimed that we shouldnt have removed the dictator of saddam husain, in iraq, all supportive of removing this dictator, and alowing even worse to come in with the Muslim brotherhood, and sharia law


example; while Egypt might be a frying pan right now with a dictator.. the fire would be the radical Muslim brotherhood



pick a winner...do we really want to chance going from the fryingpan to the fire???


yes there are alot of assumptions

but as they say..."the devil you know, as opposed to the devil you dont know"


it is similar (not exactly the same but similar) to Iran... the shah was a dictator,, loved by some hated by some....but the ayatollahs(sp?) are far worse

just because the 'people' vote -- mob rule-- a democracy...doesn’t mean it’s always a good thing....the majority wanted and continued slavery here in the usa for nearly 100 years before it was abolished
We had no right to remove Iraq's Dictator, just as we have no right to do the same in Egypt. Thankfully, we have a President that will not take such unilateral action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 07:58 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,168,852 times
Reputation: 3411
Because they really aren't all that concerned about "democracy." They just like to throw around the word when it's convenient for their purposes--you know--it's SOUNDS all warm and fuzzy and patriotic--and then conveniently throw it away when they don't get what benefits them the most.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,489,950 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
I absolutely love these threads

Supposed Communists (you know, the ones who form oppressive government run states and outlaw religion)...

like Code Pink (you know, the mom's and grandmothers who want the world to solve conflict with diplomacy vs. violence)

are accused of working hand in hand with Islamic fundamentalist terrorists (you know, the ones who want to form an oppressive THEOCRACY and impose state run religion)...

TO MARCH FOR DEMOCRACY!!

The evidence for this? The people in the streets are MARCHING! CARRYING SIGNS!! USING SOCIAL MEDIA!!

How, I ask you, could one of the most modern, secular countries in the Arab world figure out how to march, make signs, and use facebook, unless the ladies of code pink single handedly organized hundreds of thousands of people in a foreign country to overthrow a dictator?? It's a conspiracy I say!!

And now I'm off to tighten the band on my reynolds wrap hat...
No one besides you is talking about code pink.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,489,950 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Saying you are against tyranny and actually being against tyranny, are different things. It's like the GOP today, they say they are for the American people, but we all know, that is far from true.
So the GOP is exaclty like the Democrats? Exactly as I have always suspected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,817 posts, read 19,355,726 times
Reputation: 9616
what does 'code pink' an anti war group have to do with this???


does the group codepink support the sharia pushers of the muslim brotherhood. or the pro-women dictatorship of mubarak???

that is an interesting question
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,392 posts, read 5,145,982 times
Reputation: 2283
Why you ask?

1. Compare Mubarak to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, WHOM the democrats supported when THEIR people started to revolt.
2. The "DICTATOR" has brokered peace deals, brought stability to the region, and btw, when you say dictator, tell me, what has he done to repress his people, other than to outlaw a fundamentalist terror organization that wants to destabilize the entire region?

To add fuel to the fire, you do realize that since Egypt has been one of our friends in the middle east, we have allowed them to purchase weapons and technology from us, and when the Muslim Brotherhood gets a hold of those weapons, they have already stated they intend to dissolve the peace treaty with Israel, AND they will have control of shipping through the SUEZ canal. You tell me who is worse, the dictator of Iran who our government supported, or the "Dictator" of Egypt who has brought peace and stability to the region?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 08:55 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,421 posts, read 20,190,353 times
Reputation: 8958
Default Misleading Thread Title

Quote:
Originally Posted by Booya View Post
Are you refering to Rush or the OP?
He must be referring to the OP.

This is another misleading thread title. If The OP had listened to Rush's show, he would know the answer.

The short answer is that in world politics as well as national politics we are often forced to suppor the lesser of two evils.

Rush coverd this situation in detail. He isn't "Pro-Mubarak" as the OP claims.

These people are going to be worse off than before, unfortunately, and Obama is on the wrong side of this issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 09:01 AM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,962,601 times
Reputation: 1032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pacific Swell View Post
I'd like to know what Tea People and Rush fans think about his support for that tyrant Mubarak. You guys have been complaining that Obama is a tyrant since he's been in office, yet you don't seem to have a problem with tyranny in other nations including Egypt.

I bet if the Obama administration was in favor of Mubarak staying in power, guys like Rush would be saying the opposite. Rush would be saying that Obama supports dictators.

Got a LINK???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2011, 09:04 AM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,962,601 times
Reputation: 1032
Obama opposed the ousting of Saddam Hussein

Obama did not encourage Iranian protesters cries for Democracy

Obama throws Mubarak under the bus

Obama only opposes people friendly to he USA and defends our enemies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top