Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2011, 10:33 AM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
FWIW the CDC blamed it on the recession.
I'm scratching my head over this one.
Can't afford to buy alcohol? Small cars with no back seats? Yeah, I got nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2011, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Can't afford to buy alcohol? Small cars with no back seats? Yeah, I got nothing.
I think abortions went up. Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,031,604 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I found this:

Teen Pregnancy Drops: CDC Study: Teen birth rate lowest in 70 years - fox59.com

FWIW the CDC blamed it on the recession.
I'm scratching my head over this one.
Well, the trend line has been on the decline since 1990. So unless we have been a perpetual state of recession for the past 21 years, I find the recession excuse highly unlikely.

Although, it would appear that in the past teen pregnancy actually increased during recessions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,672,365 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I found this:

Teen Pregnancy Drops: CDC Study: Teen birth rate lowest in 70 years - fox59.com


FWIW the CDC blamed it on the recession.
I'm scratching my head over this one.
Pardon me in laughing, but like you, I am scratching my head after I finished laughing. I guess when the economy is good, teens say, Oh Hell I have the money to support a kid, lets go make one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,672,365 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Park View Post
Maybe teenagers finally figured out how to use condoms?
or maybe other forms of birth control? Maybe some learned how to just say "no" and some found out how easy it is to get an abortion. I hope it wasn't the last reason.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,253,825 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I wonder if the abortion numbers went up ?
Just came to light that the CDC is going to deep six the abortion report.
The very interesting part of this whole story is that the abortion numbers reported by the CDC all those years were taken from the reports of that Guttmacher group and so are these numbers. Now that left leaning organization may be credible to many lefties but certainly not to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,271,474 times
Reputation: 11416
From your link:
The birth rate of girls ages 15 to 19 was 39.1 births per 1,000 in 2009, according to data from the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The birth rate remained steady or dropped among girls ages 15 to 17 in every state except West Virginia.

You think that 39.1 births per 1,000 girls aged 15-19 is acceptable?
The US is still highest in the industrialized world.

Interesting perspective.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_tee_pre_percap-health-teenage-pregnancy-per-capita (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 01:05 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,445,137 times
Reputation: 3647
I actually think MTV's "16 and Pregnant" and "Teen Mom" had something to do with. I read an article where it said 80% of teens had seen the show at least once, and while it makes being a teen mom look glamorous sometimes, there are plenty of times when the girls on it have doors closed to them that would be open were they not teen moms.

I know it sounds crazy, but I really do think that if 80% of teens have seen the show, it could have something to do with the falling teen birth rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 01:07 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,445,137 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
Pardon me in laughing, but like you, I am scratching my head after I finished laughing. I guess when the economy is good, teens say, Oh Hell I have the money to support a kid, lets go make one.
Yeah, I can see how the recession would make married couples in their 20s and 30s postpone having a kid for a couple years, but I seriously doubt the recession would have any effect on the teen birth rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2011, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,031,604 times
Reputation: 1464
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
From your link:
The birth rate of girls ages 15 to 19 was 39.1 births per 1,000 in 2009, according to data from the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The birth rate remained steady or dropped among girls ages 15 to 17 in every state except West Virginia.

You think that 39.1 births per 1,000 girls aged 15-19 is acceptable?
The US is still highest in the industrialized world.

Interesting perspective.

Teenage pregnancy (per capita) (most recent) by country (http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_tee_pre_percap-health-teenage-pregnancy-per-capita - broken link)
Teen births in the US have fallen continuously from a high of 115 per 1,000 in 1990 to 39 today. A 66% reduction seems like a move in the positive direction to me..

(By the way your "perspective" numbers are from 1998...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top