Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Building high-speed trains will obviously create jobs. But they have potential to do even more. Say a high speed train gets built in rural Iowa. These folks would be able to commute to Chicago or St. Louis to work for a fraction of the time it would take to drive.
During previous recessions, people would pack up and move to cities with job growth. Now, due to the dismal housing market, people are less likely to move away.
These high-speed trains can change the way we think about commuting. They can let people in rural areas compete for jobs in the city.
U.S. unveils $53 billion in high-speed rail plan - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110208/pl_nm/us_usa_transport_rail - broken link)
Sheer stupidity.
Extremely high price tag and not the right population density or crime rates to support it.
Here's a solution:
Lower the crime rates in the cities to match those rural Iowa towns. After that you'll see migration back into the cities.
High speed rail will only fail in low population density areas. Low crime is also beneficial, as people hate leaving their cars just to have them broken into.
I disagree. I think people care more about employment than crime stats. Fact is, rural areas have been losing a lot of jobs for decades. Giving these folks better access to the job centers will be huge.
Higher unemployment creates the environment for higher crime. Having said that, if billions a year in subsidies to oil companies is no big deal, catching up to the rest of the developed world in infrastructure shouldn't be either. In fact, remove oil subsidies and use it for infrastructural development.
If it truly improves the economy it can be done by private organizations with private funding
Their lobby will have to be at least as strong as that of the oil companies. Do you think that is possible in America where oil runs in the veins of the people?
Okay, build a rail. That creates jobs. When the rail is done, so are the jobs.
Yeah, and in the meantime, you and me will not have gotten richer. America can only get richer off of selling things to other countries that others want. We can temporarily employ people, but we're doing so through taxation on those who are already working.
I love how jump-starting the economy means getting consumerism up again (which will largely be based on credit).
I'm a big advocate of public transportation, but we do not need to spend more....I agree with someone else who said to remove the subsidies off of oil and reallocate those funds to projects like these.
Last edited by gallowsCalibrator; 02-08-2011 at 03:37 PM..
Reason: Edited quote to reflect current version
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.