Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Reconquista in the Southwest:Obama Administration Declares 3,500 No-Go Zone in Arizona « Red Alerts: The American Survival Blog
Much like the Muslim run No-Go zones in France, America now has large swaths of our own country that the government has ceded control over to violent non-state actors who are exploiting Liberal angst to build their own states within a state. Mexican based trans-national gangs are now in charge of 3,500 acres of Arizona including parts of Buenos Ares National Park: "Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu told Fox News that violence against law enforcement officers and U.S. citizens has increased in the past four months, forcing officers on an 80 mile stretch of Arizona land north of the Mexico border off-limits to Americans."
Article 1, Section 8, To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions...
In case you are unclear on those terms, it is saying that the public servants in Washington D.C. owe us a duty to secure our rights, and should call forth the militia (defined as ALL able bodied male citizens between 17 and 45), and repel said invasion in all "no-go zones".
Title 10 USC Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, CITIZENS of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
(BTW - this is why conscription and "Selective Service" are legal - if you're a citizen, you've "volunteered" for the duration!)
So why did you quote the common law definition from Wikipedia?
Adverse possession is a term of art with an exact definition.
Do you even read what you post?
Do you bother to answer the question before complaining?
What would you prefer to use in place of adverse possession, to describe the actions of invaders?
Blogs?
Really?
How about something from a credible source?
You mean like the main stream media? These days they seem to simply be arms of the democratic party structure. They simply don't qualify as being "unbiased" anymore.
Blogs?
Really?
How about something from a credible source?
Attacking the source but not the content.
Have you actually paid attention to the news? The "no-go" zones in National Forest areas of AZ up into Colorado is well documented and falls under the common knowledge category.
Perhaps you could post something to disprove the OP's links instead?
As you may have read or seen in the news, various places around the world, and in America have become "no-go zones".
In many countries, sections of cities are basically occupied by forces and interests not subservient to the government. Police do not dare intrude. Those who trespass, are severely mistreated or killed.
In case you are feeling uncomfortable, but do not have the words to express it, it's called "adverse possession".
It's when someone TAKES LAND, and controls it without permission of the original owner or authority, and will not surrender it.
Adverse possession is a process by which premises can change ownership. It is a common law concept concerning the title to real property (land and the fixed structures built upon it). By adverse possession, title to another's real property can be acquired without compensation, by holding the property in a manner that conflicts with the true owner's rights for a specified period. For example, "squatter's rights" are a specific form of adverse possession.
When any portion of the USA is a "no-go zone" because of foreign occupation that it a sign that the nation has been invaded by hostile forces.
You have been notified.
You might ask why Congress has failed to act, since it is delegated power, via Article 1, Section 8, To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions...
In case you are unclear on those terms, it is saying that the public servants in Washington D.C. owe us a duty to secure our rights, and should call forth the militia (defined as ALL able bodied male citizens between 17 and 45), and repel said invasion in all "no-go zones".
The next question: What do we do with the invaders? [] Banish [] Incarcerate at public expense [] Terminate?
Failure to act is acquiescence to the transfer of sovereignty over American soil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics
Do you bother to answer the question before complaining?
What would you prefer to use in place of adverse possession, to describe the actions of invaders?
Oh are these the questions (in red), what to do with the invaders? Sorry they were kind of buried
It seemed like it was just some gigantic rant cut and pasted into a post.
Anyway, you seem rather attached to adverse possession so why not keep using it. It gives your argument a lot of credibility along with your citation to the venerable Jawa Report.
You mean like the main stream media? These days they seem to simply be arms of the democratic party structure. They simply don't qualify as being "unbiased" anymore.
Anything with credible sources, be it left, right, or Martian.
Get it?
Oh are these the questions (in red), what to do with the invaders? Sorry they were kind of buried
It seemed like it was just some gigantic rant cut and pasted into a post.
Anyway, you seem rather attached to adverse possession so why not keep using it. It gives your argument a lot of credibility along with your citation to the venerable Jawa Report.
Excellent slant, diversion, and spin!
Not once did you deny that America was invaded, nor did you question the inaction of the government to defend America.
Kudos!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
