Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,748,514 times
Reputation: 3146

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
So to borrow from what HappyTexan stated, if they don't participate in the Federal Lunch Program they would still need to provide lunches for low income students that decided to enroll in the district? They would need some sort of storage facilities to store the prepared lunches.

I'm not trying to be combative, and I'm not necessarily for or against school choice. I'm just trying to understand how it would work in actuality. In theory, it sounds great.

If they had a child enroll in their school from their school district tomorrow, who qualified for the Federal lunch program tomorrow ,they would have to figure it out.

Again it doesn't seem unreasonable for the school to somehow aquire a lunch for the incredibly few children who may enter a school district that don't already have kids who qualify for the program. I can't tell you that Fran from the office would call Vito's deli and have a chicken sandwich deivered, but it would be something like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,722,105 times
Reputation: 35920
This issue was discussed on the education forum.

IMO, state-wide open enrollment, as is in many states, should be implemented everywhere to prevent problems like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:43 PM
 
Location: tampa bay
7,126 posts, read 8,649,029 times
Reputation: 11772
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Then they are going to need "nice" clothes of they are being driven to better school districts.

Clothing allowance !
No uniforms and we even had a uniform closet in our little Catholic school that was filled with gently used uniforms! The devil is always in the details...but we better start paying on the front end for a change instead of the backend
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,460,154 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishiis49 View Post
No uniforms and we even had a uniform closet in our little Catholic school that was filled with gently used uniforms! The devil is always in the details...but we better start paying on the front end for a change instead of the backend
I went to Catholic school as well.

"Plaid" is a dirty word to me and to this day refuse to wear any
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,324,587 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
If they had a child enroll in their school from their school district tomorrow, who qualified for the Federal lunch program tomorrow ,they would have to figure it out.

Again it doesn't seem unreasonable for the school to somehow aquire a lunch for the incredibly few children who may enter a school district that don't already have kids who qualify for the program. I can't tell you that Fran from the office would call Vito's deli and have a chicken sandwich deivered, but it would be something like that.
But they don't participate in the Federal Lunch program and never have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:50 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,045,301 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishiis49 View Post
Private/Catholic schools have been educating kids successfully for alot less then public schools for many years!Vouchers are a good solution for parents stuck in a bad school system.
The reason that parochial schools can spend less per child is the low pay of the teachers.

Those teachers are in parochial schools because it's a low pressure teaching environment.

The parents are better because they have a stake in their child's education.

They can also launch kids that are disciplinary problems.

They don't suffer fools.

That would all come crumbling down if a bunch of public school kids invaded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:50 PM
 
Location: tampa bay
7,126 posts, read 8,649,029 times
Reputation: 11772
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I went to Catholic school as well.

"Plaid" is a dirty word to me and to this day refuse to wear any
And so itchy!! But here in Florida the kids wear khakis and polo shirts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:53 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,722,105 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
The reason that parochial schools can spend less per child is the low pay of the teachers.

Those teachers are in parochial schools because it's a low pressure teaching environment.

The parents are better because they have a stake in their child's education.

They can also launch kids that are disciplinary problems.

They don't suffer fools.

That would all come crumbling down if a bunch of public school kids invaded.
Priests and nuns take a vow of poverty, so yes, you are correct. Most other pastors, lay teachers, etc are also paid fairly low by most standards.

I vehemently disagree that parochial school parents are "better" than public school parents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 08:55 PM
 
Location: tampa bay
7,126 posts, read 8,649,029 times
Reputation: 11772
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
The reason that parochial schools can spend less per child is the low pay of the teachers.

Those teachers are in parochial schools because it's a low pressure teaching environment.

The parents are better because they have a stake in their child's education.

They can also launch kids that are disciplinary problems.

They don't suffer fools.

That would all come crumbling down if a bunch of public school kids invaded.
Many of your points are valid. The pay is lower. However,hopefully parents with vouchers would also tend to be more involved and as far as behavior problems have you ever met Catholic school teachers? I would have said nuns but there aren't many left these days
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2011, 09:00 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,981,179 times
Reputation: 1032
Democrats (including Al Sharpton) were against them before they were for them!!

How quickly things change. This used to be something that Democrats accused Republicans of backing.

BTW.....lying about your home address and cheating a school district out of the money that pays to teach your kid is FRAUD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top