
02-25-2011, 04:54 PM
|
|
|
Location: The Heartland
4,457 posts, read 4,074,875 times
Reputation: 760
|
|
“I think that’s something you get to much later. But I think clearly it is a dereliction of duty. Clearly it’s a violation of his constitutional oath. Clearly it is not something that can be allowed to stand."
Read more on Newsmax.com: Gingrich: If Palin Took Obama Actions, There Would Be Calls for Impeachment
|

02-25-2011, 04:58 PM
|
|
|
Location: New Mexico
8,391 posts, read 9,168,478 times
Reputation: 4070
|
|
Does anyone care what Gingrich thinks/says? 
|

02-25-2011, 05:00 PM
|
|
|
Location: The Heartland
4,457 posts, read 4,074,875 times
Reputation: 760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skoro
Does anyone care what Gingrich thinks/says? 
|
Maybe not, but does he have a point (But I think clearly it is a dereliction of duty. Clearly it’s a violation of his constitutional oath.)
|

02-25-2011, 05:02 PM
|
|
|
42,873 posts, read 23,788,509 times
Reputation: 22799
|
|
Gingrich is the flip side of the same bad penny.
Meanwhile, I remain optimistic Obama will be impeached in 2012.
|

02-25-2011, 05:03 PM
|
|
|
Location: Littleton, CO
20,893 posts, read 15,566,516 times
Reputation: 3954
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUEGRITT
But I think clearly it is a dereliction of duty. Clearly it’s a violation of his constitutional oath.
|
It never has been before.
|

02-25-2011, 05:05 PM
|
|
|
10,092 posts, read 7,924,210 times
Reputation: 3411
|
|
My understanding is that they have to enforce the law, but I didn't know the government had to defend the constitutionality question--isn't he just leaving it open for a challenge to go through to the Supreme Court now without interference? If that's the case, how is that a dereliction of duty?
|

02-25-2011, 05:06 PM
|
|
|
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,351 posts, read 116,296,500 times
Reputation: 35920
|
|
Gingrich is a fine one to talk about "Defense of Marriage", considering his own marital problems. And what's this crap about Sarah Palin? She was not running for pres, and it doesn't look like she will. We should all deal with reality, not some alternative universe where she is president (G*d forbid!).
|

02-25-2011, 05:08 PM
|
|
|
Location: The Heartland
4,457 posts, read 4,074,875 times
Reputation: 760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude
It never has been before.
|
Is it now?
|

02-25-2011, 05:09 PM
|
|
|
3,681 posts, read 6,103,843 times
Reputation: 1511
|
|
I think he makes a good point when he suggests what most likely would happen in a similar situation with a different president & different issue.
“Imagine that Governor Palin had become president. Imagine that she had announced that Roe versus Wade in her view was unconstitutional and therefore the United States government would no longer protect anyone’s right to have an abortion because she personally had decided it should be changed. The news media would have gone crazy. The New York Times would have demanded her impeachment."
Read more on Newsmax.com: Gingrich: If Palin Took Obama Actions, There Would Be Calls for Impeachment
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
|

02-25-2011, 05:41 PM
|
|
|
Location: The Heartland
4,457 posts, read 4,074,875 times
Reputation: 760
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana
Gingrich is a fine one to talk about "Defense of Marriage", considering his own marital problems. And what's this crap about Sarah Palin? She was not running for pres, and it doesn't look like she will. We should all deal with reality, not some alternative universe where she is president (G*d forbid!).
|
After Clinton, I don't think anything about anybodies marriage should be used to deflect from the point of the thread.
Does he have a point?
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|