Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL....."Due Process" doesn't have anything to do with a rule passed within the State Senate. For that matter, neither does the 1st.
I doubt that I'd be going too far out on a limb to say that methinks that the Wisconsin Sate Senators just might know a bit more about what they can and cannot make rules about than you do.
LOL....."Due Process" doesn't have anything to do with a rule passed within the State Senate. For that matter, neither does the 1st.
Yet another thing that is ultimately not your call.
It must be very frustrating for you to live on a planet where you don't make all the rules.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoobleKar
I doubt that I'd be going too far out on a limb to say that methinks that the Wisconsin Sate Senators just might know a bit more about what they can and cannot make rules about than you do.
Oh, I have little doubt that even they do not believe the rules will stand up.
They took an oath "faithfully to discharge the duties of their office to the best of their ability."
That's a whole lot bigger than merely "legislating." It's a real responsibility to real constituents.
They do not get that simple FACT. For Repubs they often forget those that voted them in office and do as they please which is the work of their masters, notice one of the first things they did was give huge tax cuts to their real owners, even though there was supposedly a budget crisis.
Casper
[quote=KoobleKar;18104743]LOL....."Due Process" doesn't have anything to do with a rule passed within the State Senate. For that matter, neither does the 1st.
I doubt that I'd be going too far out on a limb to say that methinks that the Wisconsin Sate Senators just might know a bit more about what they can and cannot make rules about than you do.[/quote]
Think we shall see what the courts think about who knows what before it is all said and done
Casper
Article IV, §7
Organization of legislature; quorum; compulsory attendance. Section 7. Each house shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members; and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may compel the attendance of absent members in such manner and under such penalties as each house may provide.
From the link you don't know how to use........
Somehow, the barking moonbats will try and twist that very specific language into something else however.
I must say it's kind of funny to hear some people that were outraged by the Republicans' use of the filibuster, a clearly defined parliamentary procedure, come on and defend fleeing to another state.
Houston3 seems to have ended the debate over if the Republicans had the power to enact such a rule.
Kudos to Houston3!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
