Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2011, 06:37 PM
 
513 posts, read 581,194 times
Reputation: 759

Advertisements

I mean really, if Republicans can manage to raise their own money, why can't Democrats? Why is it that they need public sector union bosses to shake down their rank and file and fill their campaign coffers? Why is it they need taxpayer money to fill their campaign coffers? Why are they so afraid of having to compete with Republicans in a free market?

Out of one side of their mouths liberals tell us that they represent the interests of the majority of the American people, the "middle class", yet out of the other side of their mouths liberals scream that without public sector unions lining their coffers, the Democrat Party is essentially powerless. Well let me ask you this, if liberals represent the viewpoint of the majority, then why would they have trouble raising money in a free market? Furthermore, if the Democrat Party can't raise money without public sector unions propping them up, doesn't that reinforce the fact that Democrats do not represent the majority of voters but rather only themselves and their cronies?

All any of this proves is that there's very little demand for Democrat politicians in a truly free market. The only reason the Democrat Party has survived so long is because they've been propped up by TARP funds in the form of public sector unions. Like all of their failed ideas (food stamps, section 8, Medicaid, Social Security, Amtrak, etc.) the Democrat Party is just one giant taxpayer subsidy that couldn't compete in a free market. That's why liberals were so infuriated when the Supreme Court overturned the campaign finance reform law. Liberalism can't compete in a free market. Like GM and Chrysler, they need to be propped up by bailouts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2011, 07:34 PM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,673,812 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirchBarlow View Post
I mean really, if Republicans can manage to raise their own money, why can't Democrats? Why is it that they need public sector union bosses to shake down their rank and file and fill their campaign coffers? Why is it they need taxpayer money to fill their campaign coffers? Why are they so afraid of having to compete with Republicans in a free market?

Out of one side of their mouths liberals tell us that they represent the interests of the majority of the American people, the "middle class", yet out of the other side of their mouths liberals scream that without public sector unions lining their coffers, the Democrat Party is essentially powerless. Well let me ask you this, if liberals represent the viewpoint of the majority, then why would they have trouble raising money in a free market? Furthermore, if the Democrat Party can't raise money without public sector unions propping them up, doesn't that reinforce the fact that Democrats do not represent the majority of voters but rather only themselves and their cronies?

All any of this proves is that there's very little demand for Democrat politicians in a truly free market. The only reason the Democrat Party has survived so long is because they've been propped up by TARP funds in the form of public sector unions. Like all of their failed ideas (food stamps, section 8, Medicaid, Social Security, Amtrak, etc.) the Democrat Party is just one giant taxpayer subsidy that couldn't compete in a free market. That's why liberals were so infuriated when the Supreme Court overturned the campaign finance reform law. Liberalism can't compete in a free market. Like GM and Chrysler, they need to be propped up by bailouts.
Your posts make little sense. And since unions are not taxpayer funded, how they spend their "rank and files" dues is none of your business.
And raising money from unions is the same as raising it from any other organization or business. And TARP was only instituted a couple of years ago the democrats have been around a lot longer than that.
I mean seriously did you think about this post before you clicked the "submit" button. Doesn't sound like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,096,532 times
Reputation: 2971
As of January 2011, the RNC had just over $2M in the bank. The DNC had just over $9M in the bank.

Guess Democrats aren't have any trouble at all raising their own monies.

Looks like your rants underlying "foundations" can't compete with free market facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 09:34 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,284,533 times
Reputation: 3296
One government union alone gave 400 million last election to Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 09:44 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
One government union alone gave 400 million last election to Obama.
So what? And?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,552,145 times
Reputation: 6319
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
One government union alone gave 400 million last election to Obama.

That's a lot seeing that Democrats raised just over $500 million during their entire campaign...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
7,835 posts, read 8,442,041 times
Reputation: 8564
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130 View Post

as of january 2011, the rnc had just over $2m in the bank. The dnc had just over $9m in the bank.

Guess democrats aren't have any trouble at all raising their own monies.

Looks like your rants underlying "foundations" can't compete with free market facts.
op = pwned
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 10:47 PM
 
513 posts, read 581,194 times
Reputation: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jill61 View Post
op = pwned
How do you figure? How much of that money wasn't from public sector unions? If it's from public sector unions, it doesn't count because that money either came directly from taxpayer revenue or it came from union dues involuntarily withheld from union rank and file paychecks. So more like Jill61 = pwned
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 10:51 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,855,128 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm2008 View Post
Your posts make little sense. And since unions are not taxpayer funded, how they spend their "rank and files" dues is none of your business.
And raising money from unions is the same as raising it from any other organization or business. And TARP was only instituted a couple of years ago the democrats have been around a lot longer than that.
I mean seriously did you think about this post before you clicked the "submit" button. Doesn't sound like it.
It is my business because I'm an average tax payer and other average tax payers like me are FORCED to pay union dues to labor unions even though they don't want to join a union. Unions collect dues or "agency fees" from non union members by force and use it to fund political campaigns that in turn support labor unions. Are you seeing the problem yet?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Reality
9,949 posts, read 8,855,128 times
Reputation: 3315
Quote:
Originally Posted by txgolfer130 View Post
As of January 2011, the RNC had just over $2M in the bank. The DNC had just over $9M in the bank.

Guess Democrats aren't have any trouble at all raising their own monies.

Looks like your rants underlying "foundations" can't compete with free market facts.
Who cares how much money is "in the bank", you're talking about Jan 2011 and you're not talking about PACs which Democrats hate unless it's theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top