So who's up for forcing women of today to hear the heartbeat of their rapist's unborn child before getting an abortion? (lawyer, laws)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So a fully formed child, capable of thought, sensation, movement is a 'mutated blob' that can be disposed of at will because -let me get this right- it can't breathe?
So let's dispose of every dependent mutated blob who requires an oxygen tank, or better yet, let's kill every asthmatic. God knows they've no right to exist. In fact, let's kill every useless clump of cells that depends on modern technology to live because hey, if they can't make it on their own outside the womb, tough luck.
once born and no longer dependent on a womb to survive, a new born baby, a toddler or any age from birth to grave is not in the abortion debate.
once born and no longer dependent on a womb to survive, a new born baby, a toddler or any age from birth to grave is not in the abortion debate.
So a baby minutes from birth is abortable? Abortion fetishists always love to retreat to legal technicalities when real morality and human pain come into play.
So let's go there. Before you answer let's be perfectly clear - that baby, hooked to a placenta or not, can feel, think and cry.
Hi ladies, how many abortions have you had today?
All from rape, incest and that life and death problem you had, right?
So you do not believe in privacy? The reasons behind a woman's decision to have an abortion are private, between herself, the father if he is in the picture, and her doctor. I'm sorry that you feel so very important that you need to know other people's private business, but you don't.
So you do not believe in privacy? The reasons behind a woman's decision to have an abortion are private, between herself, the father if he is in the picture, and her doctor. I'm sorry that you feel so very important that you need to know other people's private business, but you don't.
Other people's private business is public business if those people are making life and death decisions for those who have no say in the matter.
So a baby minutes from birth is abortable? Abortion fetishists always love to retreat to legal technicalities when real morality and human pain come into play.
So let's go there. Before you answer let's be perfectly clear - that baby, hooked to a placenta or not, can feel, think and cry.
the "adorableness" of a baby minutes from birth is in the eye of the beholder.
abortion do not happen to new borns so just what are you trying to get at?
So a baby minutes from birth is abortable? Abortion fetishists always love to retreat to legal technicalities when real morality and human pain come into play.
So let's go there. Before you answer let's be perfectly clear - that baby, hooked to a placenta or not, can feel, think and cry.
Do you understand Roe v. Wade? Even know how it is written? Here you go, perhaps you'd like to familiarize yourself with it. And yes Roe has since changed her mind, we all know that. By the way, IT'S THE LAW OF THE LAND!:
Other people's private business is public business if those people are making life and death decisions for those who have no say in the matter.
Sorry, but even for those with a God-complex, you nor anyone else has control over a women's body or mind. I am sure that is irksome for some, but it's the law.
the "adorableness" of a baby minutes from birth is in the eye of the beholder.
abortion do not happen to new borns so just what are you trying to get at?
You're the one who said that abortion is OK right up until the point of birth, so you tell me. All I'm trying to get at is how a sane person can rationalize the depraved idea that a baby is no functioning person right up until its head pops out.
Do you understand Roe v. Wade? Even know how it is written? Here you go, perhaps you'd like to familiarize yourself with it. And yes Roe has since changed her mind, we all know that. By the way, IT'S THE LAW OF THE LAND!:
I understand Natural Law and I understand law constructed by Lawyers.
Incidentally, depriving Negroes and women of fundamental civil rights was once the LAW OF THE LAND. Care to explain why you're in favour of that then?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.