Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2011, 04:29 AM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,858,570 times
Reputation: 4142

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post

despite the fact that it is far safer than any other industry in the nation.

massive energy costs, and future grid unreliablity,
than an easy, safe and cheap source of energy whose entire 40-year waste can be kept indefinitely in a water-filled pool similar to a back-yard sized swimming pool.

Are you for real?cheap? a plant costs no less than $10B and takes 10 years min to build. All plants have had 100% costs over run. The customers of the power companies have had their bills go up 400%

There is nothing cheap about nuclear power. For the price of the one plant which only is designed to last 25-30 years you could convert every home they would service to a renewable power source and eliminate the monthly electric bill.

Because companies have such huge outlays in these plants they don't want to decommission them. and they use them twice as long or more than they were designed for.

The waste is dangerous for 200,000 years. That is 100 times longer than the longest surviving government has survived. We can't clean up toxic landfills think we can track something for 200,000 years?

As to safe..

chernobyl gallery - Google Search

Tell those victims how great the safety record is. Here is the difference if a windmill has a catastrophic accident a cow dies in a field when a blade falls off. when radiation leaks biology is transformed. Come back in 30 years and tell the victims of Japan how safe it is and how cheap their power was when it worked, I'm sure they will value that opinion.

or could the victims end up being closer to home as the radiation clouds cover our country? or as those radioactive tides come our way? or the sea produces food you can't consume or deformities yet to be seen...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2011, 04:33 AM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,316,613 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by cruxan View Post
i think japan is trying to save that nuke power plant it's one of the biggest in the world.. and the biggest one Kashiwazaki Kariwa is down the coast..
the second largest is on the great lakes bruce power plant
http://windconcernsontario.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/7618e7344de3aa5cf719c28f6b5c.jpg (broken link)
It is the largest nuclear facility in North America, and second largest in the world (after Japan), with eight reactors at around 800 MWe each, in total 6,232 MW (net) and 7,276 MW (gross) ITER and DEMO will maybe bring fusion to us though
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 05:10 AM
 
Location: Chicago
4,085 posts, read 4,335,713 times
Reputation: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by artsyguy View Post
It's already a Chernobyl.
It might be a "three mile island" too.
The OP posted this thread long before that was known.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2013, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,831,906 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Its not even close to there, nor is it even close to the same situation. Chernoble used graphite to cool their rods, Japan uses water. Graphite as we all know will catch fire, water wont..
In addition Japan has an extra casing that Chernoble did not...

Its not already there, nor is it even close..

Why the Fukushima disaster is worse than Chernobyl - Asia - World - The Independent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2013, 06:33 PM
 
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,730,207 times
Reputation: 20050

Chernobyl isn't dumping 300 plus tons of highly radiated water into the oceans every day


blue fin tuna anyone??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top