Quote:
Originally Posted by wxjay
People in this country (and others) simply do not understand what is "safe" and what is not. The word "radiation" is suddenly perceived as "dangerous", when the fact is that (a) there is very little, if any, body of scientific knowledge on what the threshold between "safe" radiation and life-threatening (we know the extremes, but not the spectrum); and more importantly (b) the exposure to radiation reported in most of these places is 3-30x (the extreme measurement listed was 300x, and even that was a single measurement) what you normally are exposed to, which overall is very negligible. However, the savants at the media have no concept of this.
|
What exactly are you saying then? We don't have to know. There is no safe radiation level. Any radiation is bad, even the so called 'background radiation' that we all live and deal with causes some of us to come down with cancer. Anything above that including dental x-rays (.01ms) or a mammogram (.04ms) can hurt someone, not everyone but there is a level at which half of people exposed to it will get cancer in the next 3 years. There is a good chance that a large number of Japanese people will be exposed to that level of radiation. Not today, not tomorrow, not even next week but likely in a month or two. Leave the !@#$$@# in the ground is dead on right! There is also this: at least one of the reactors in the complex is running plutonium fuel. Plutonium is still deadly after 24,000 years... ...
. What is anyone thinking when they design a reactor using fuel that dangerous? Are they in fact, thinking? Hmmmmmm.
H