Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm a little concerned about this too. The message sent by having the nation's top law enforcement official deliver remarks on what is supposedly an intervention for prevention of attacks on innocent only is not good. Sends the message that maybe we are planning on doing more than just preventing attacks on innocents.
I cannot think of any other time in my life when something as serious as we have happening around the world like today when an AG does the speaking for a President.
Maybe a poster here is correct, Holder is preparing to defend Obama's decision to attack Libya and he just handed us a freebie head start.
If so, then they must already know he did something wrong or why else start defending before anyone even gets a chance to discuss it.
Feeling guilty already?
Or does Holder actually believe he has the authority to be speaking on international affairs?
Something just is not right about him even talking about it.
Can you imagine if Gonzalez would have made a statement like this the loons would be going crazy in the streets. Holder gets a free pass for some reason.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.