NATO taking over Libya conflict (Colin Powell, spokeswoman, North Dakota, European)

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by oz in SC

The USA does the bulk of the fighting,just a small point.

The point of the thread is that NATO is taking over in Libya.

[oz in SC]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

The point of the thread is that NATO is taking over in Libya.

And the USA will be responsible for pulling most of the weight still..

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by florida.bob

Hotair? That's like getting you news from Michelle Malkin ... oh wait, that is getting your news from Michelle Malkin!!!

Wrong again.

Just knowing Obama and being able to predict his next moves is a gift I have.

Are you for Obama aiding the enemy then?

And you still never answered my questions pages back.

Do you also believe it is smart to allow NATO to command our military?

You probably wont answer these questions either unless Psycho Ed Schultz tells you to.

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by oz in SC

Psst,you,a leftist favor more warfare and killing.
I a conservative think we should not be involved.

So who supports a policy of armed conflict again?

Obama robots will follow their failed hero right off a cliff and put our troops and civilians in harms way to find something they can finally give Obama credit for.

Problem is this poster wants to give credit to Obama for Egypt and now Libya when we are finding out he is aiding the enemy with his decisions yet they still back him up.

Libs who follow ( I do not think many are left ) Obama are desperate for anything Obama has his crusty hands on to turn out good for once. HINT: Not going to happen.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by oz in SC

And the USA will be responsible for pulling most of the weight still..

That may be so, but the more weight NATO carries, the better.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90

Wrong again.

Just knowing Obama and being able to predict his next moves is a gift I have.

Are you for Obama aiding the enemy then?

What do you mean 'aiding the enemy'?

[oz in SC]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

That may be so, but the more weight NATO carries, the better.

The current coalition had 12 members or so.

A few days ago,the USA was performing over half of all the air missions.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by oz in SC

The current coalition had 12 members or so.

A few days ago,the USA was performing over half of all the air missions.

And now NATO is taking over more. I read that even Norway and Denmark are joining

[oz in SC]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

And now NATO is taking over more. I read that even Norway and Denmark are joining

There are I think 28 members of NATO.

Germany is not taking part I know.

The USA will most likely be providing most of the forces needed.

[Sunny-Days-in-Florida]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

What do you mean 'aiding the enemy'?

If you do not know at least try to read some of the other threads.

The answer is right there is you want to really understand.

Or are you ignoring the fact that Obama has screwed up once again with a poor decision?