Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Our 'money' should be debt-free and backed by the faith in our government and workers - we should use it to purchase goods based on that premise - we should NOT have to borrow our 'money' from private bankers, and pay them back with tax dollars collected on our labor.
Why are Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich the only Congressmen who are talking about it?
Why are there no comments - this is about the most important topic that exists today - the destruction of our economy
Absolutely. I have posted before that people should watch Money Masters and Money as Debt- available on youtube. It seems that most of us simply do not know how the current system works and that it is unnecessary to be held hostage to it. They do not teach us about this in school.
Our 'money' should be debt-free and backed by the faith in our government and workers - we should use it to purchase goods based on that premise - we should NOT have to borrow our 'money' from private bankers, and pay them back with tax dollars collected on our labor.
Why are Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich the only Congressmen who are talking about it?
Probably because the topic shows that the democrats and republicans ... liberals and false conservatives are equally complicit in this heist ... and the vast majority are neck deep in the false left-right argument. They prefer to point fingers and insult each other, rather than really examine issues legitimately.
Or, to sum it up in fewer words .... "Thinking is hard work, which is why you don't see many people doing it." - Sue Grafton - American Novelist.
Our 'money' should be debt-free and backed by the faith in our government and workers - we should use it to purchase goods based on that premise - we should NOT have to borrow our 'money' from private bankers, and pay them back with tax dollars collected on our labor.
Why are Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich the only Congressmen who are talking about it?
Our 'money' should be debt-free and backed by the faith in our government and workers - we should use it to purchase goods based on that premise - we should NOT have to borrow our 'money' from private bankers, and pay them back with tax dollars collected on our labor.
Several flaws with your posting
1) The money is backed by the faith of the government.
2) Abolishing the FED wont limit our needs to borrow from private bankers. We are running TRILLION dollar deficits. Either we borrow it, or we print it, and I dont think we'd like the effects on inflation if we printed that much money yearly adding it into circulation.
More hysteria for people from alarmists who want to go back to a 19th century financial system to deal with 21st century problems.
By the the way the FED actually CONTRIBUTED to the United States Treasury last year.
If there is anything more 'hysterical' than paying trillions in sweat labor to pay private bankers for the priviledge of them printing money out of thin air and lending it to us with interest, I would like to know about it. The same scam that traps us trillions in debt, traps third world countries billions in debt to the IMF bankers. There is no need to use banks as intermediaries for world trade commerce. that can be negotiated between countires, based on national collateralization of resources and gdp. National banks are necessary for this prupose, not private banking interests who hold country's economies hostage to debt.
The FED contributed to the Treasury? You mean they 'bought' some treasuries by reducing some of the owed debt on their computers?
Several flaws with your posting
1) The money is backed by the faith of the government.
2) Abolishing the FED wont limit our needs to borrow from private bankers. We are running TRILLION dollar deficits. Either we borrow it, or we print it, and I dont think we'd like the effects on inflation if we printed that much money yearly adding it into circulation.
We wouldn't need as much money if there were no FED private bankers STEALING most of it, and sending it off to other European PRIVATE BANKS.
More hysteria for people from alarmists who want to go back to a 19th century financial system to deal with 21st century problems.
By the the way the FED actually CONTRIBUTED to the United States Treasury last year.
REALLY ? What, pray tell did they contribute?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
