Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-07-2011, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
Wrong! The Ryan plan calls for cutting the same amount from defense that Obama calls for.
Paul Ryan is a guy who thinks that military spending hasn't been a problem.

I'm sure he thinks that 80% increase in defense spending in 2009 compared to 1999 was a necessity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2011, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Paul Ryan is a guy who thinks that military spending hasn't been a problem.

I'm sure he thinks that 80% increase in defense spending in 2009 compared to 1999 was a necessity?
oh no not a meaningless number like 80%

ss in 1999 ................. 378billion................ss in 2010 ............. 719b............a 90% increase
medicare/caid in 1999....296billion..... care/caid in 2010 ..............797b...........a 170% increase

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oh no not a meaningless number like 80%

ss in 1999 ................. 378billion......ss in 2010 ........ 719b........a 90% increase
medicare/caid in 1999....296billion care/caid in 2010 797b......a 170% increase


Thanks for letting me be more aware of your clueless in comparing numbers. I get it that you can at least divide, add, subtract and multiply (not that I've bothered to check your numbers, anyway).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
If we do not cut spending now, we will be forced to make even harder cuts in the future. Our interest on the debt alone is a very significant part of our federal expenditures. If we continue the way we are going, that will only continue to grow. It would be expected to grow very quickly as interest rates we pay to borrow money increase, due to our reduced ability to pay it back. This spending on the debt further cuts what we have available to spend on other items, rather domestic or defense. We simply can't keep doing what we have been doing.
Very true. The interest payments on the National Debt is the fourth largest single expenditure in the budget, just behind Defense spending. In FY2010, we paid $414 billion in interest on the National Debt. In just the first four months of FY2011 we have already spent $169,361,712,628.99 in interest. Which means by the end of FY2011 we will have spent $508,085,137,886.97 just on interest.

Source: Government - Interest Expense on the Debt Outstanding

That is an increase of $94 billion in just interest payments on the National Debt alone from FY2010, and Boehner is only proposing to cut $61 billion? Truly pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,876 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Thanks for letting me be more aware of your clueless in comparing numbers. I get it that you can at least divide, add, subtract and multiply (not that I've bothered to check your numbers, anyway).
You haven't provided any figures for comparison...his are the best we have.

So defense spending has increased 80%, while in the same time we have increased medicare and medicaid 170%...and out of control defense spending is the problem?



What would the defecit look like if we reduced those values to the same rate of increase as defense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Rockport Texas from El Paso
2,601 posts, read 8,522,953 times
Reputation: 1606
Yikes i just started this thread this morning and there are too many pages to read during lunch. Yes its $1 trillion over a time period. Toyman medicare and medicade have increased because we have many more older as well as unhealthy people who need those programs.

I'd rather have unemployed bombs and missiles, than teachers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,822,592 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
You haven't provided any figures for comparison...his are the best we have.
I provided you a whole damn link for you to play with. And I guess, like him, you're also into basic addition, subtraction, multiplication and division and assume that you could take a number from 1980s and use it as is three decades later.

Quote:
So defense spending has increased 80%, while in the same time we have increased medicare and medicaid 170%...and out of control defense spending is the problem?
I would like to see your math. And the definition of "problem". To me, almost $400B increase in spending in a year IS a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,876 posts, read 26,514,597 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I provided you a whole damn link for you to play with. And I guess, like him, you're also into basic addition, subtraction, multiplication and division and assume that you could take a number from 1980s and use it as is three decades later.

I would like to see your math. And the definition of "problem". To me, almost $400B increase in spending in a year IS a problem.
As far as I could determine, your link doesn't provide figures adjusted to a common baseline (2009 $$ for example), and I haven't taken the time to look for a conversion. It seemed like you had one.

As to the math part, it's been a couple of years (OK, decades) since doing multi-variate calculus and Fourier transforms, but if necessary, I can still do them. But we're talking basic accounting here....guess what, addition, subtraction multiplation and division are generally all that's required. Oh, and a source.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2011, 02:18 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,054,479 times
Reputation: 10270
"We the People" are for cutting ALL waste.

I am all for cutting the waste and abuse in ALL programs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2011, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Given that the military budget is around $590 billion, it would be tough to cut $1 trillion.

The military needs to be cut, as well as EVERY government program.
you did not include the interest on the debt. Probably didn't include the money going to Libya. He has said in the past we spend a trillion a year building our empire. That is probably where the thought comes from. Usually people do not look into what Ron or Rand Paul says and go by 30 second sound bites from a blogger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top