Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2011, 04:16 PM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,683,268 times
Reputation: 9400

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000 View Post
Why is it matter if it is page 6 or 60. High wage or low wage? The point is, the government need to downsize. When the country is 14 trillion dollars in debt, then they need to cut down the debt instead of increasing it.

Downsize sure. Cut the wages of people without proving they are making too much is another matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2011, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Hoyvík, Faroe Islands
378 posts, read 577,762 times
Reputation: 153
A good way to judge if the person bitching about what we pay government employees knows what they are at all talking about is to ask them to form an opinion on what we pay Foreign Service Officers.

So lets have it. What do you think about what we pay FSOs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2011, 04:24 PM
 
3,128 posts, read 6,543,384 times
Reputation: 1599
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Most of those start at $34k.
And many of them are in the DC area.
You should always look at the exceptions, and only the exceptions; that's a great way to start discourse.

These jobs were around during the Bush administration.
Didn't hear you whine then.
Oh yeah, couldn't be partisan if that were the case.
Bingo.....amazing what people see now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2011, 09:41 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,838,936 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by maja View Post
I don't care who the president is or was.\
yeah sure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2011, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Hoyvík, Faroe Islands
378 posts, read 577,762 times
Reputation: 153
The Navy is cutting down its personnel now. They have a Perform to Serve program. Those that do not perform well are not allowed to reenlist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2011, 10:18 PM
 
Location: Imaginary Figment
11,449 posts, read 14,483,170 times
Reputation: 4777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
stupid spending wasn't quite so much an issue at the time of Bush, considering the national debt was just over half of what it is now.
Bush doubled the debt and sent deficits soaring. You either are against spending or you are not. Please don't try and rationalize something that is clearly irrational with us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2011, 10:48 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,314,323 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smedskjaer View Post
Thanks!
I've never looked at that federal site before.
It's good to see that education is recognized and awarded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2011, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,314,323 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristineVA View Post
As I listed with factcheck.org, none of the studies done are valid. The government is working to undergo a new study, such as the one done in the 1990s, that does a true comparison. Until then, none of these studies on either side are worth anything and CERTAINLY not any that are performed by two organizations that are on the payroll of Republicans. You cannot make decisions to cut people's salaries and benefits until an honest study is done.

I know you really WANT to believe the federal workers are overpaid and others WANT to believe they are underpaid. Right now, no one can really determine what is fact.

And these days, I will agree, that benefits in the public sector "might" outpace private because the corporations have stripped their employees down to bare bones (unless you are up at the top).

A federal worker no longer gets a pension.

They get a 401K plan
The get 4 hours of annual leave plus 4 hours of sick leave per pay period--this does increse with time in service.
The get the employer to pay for some of their insurance premiums. A single policy is running the employee about $75 per pay period and a family policy is closer to $200 per pay period.

Not as good as the private company I left but better than what a lot of people get.
Sick leave never increases from 4 hours per pay period.
The insurance gets increased annually; I believe a single now pays around $85/pay period.

You're right, instead of holding private industry accountable, they want to hit the people who took lower wages over the decades for security/holiday time.

If these jobs are so lucrative, why aren't these people applying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Hoyvík, Faroe Islands
378 posts, read 577,762 times
Reputation: 153
No idea.
Maybe they require degrees in communication?

The OP never made a statement on FSOs btw.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Maryland, USA
152 posts, read 217,329 times
Reputation: 295
I think anyone that has lived in the DC area can tell you that they know many people that seem to have pretty cushy careers working for the government / military. Many of them retire at very early ages, have ridiculous amounts of built up sick leave and vacation days, and seem to be pretty well off ... when compared to their civilian counterparts.

The discrepancies tend to be a lot larger when you compare some of the mid-level types of jobs the government comes up with, and what the employees are actually doing on a daily basis. (ie; admin assistants, secretaries, warehouse workers, security guards, clerks, middle management, etc.).

They often become real obvious when you actually interact with these government workers, and find yourself wondering how in the world they keep upgrading their pay level every few years ... when you wouldn't even entrust them to park your car or balance your checkbook.

I'm not saying there aren't a lot of hard working, intelligent folks in our government ... but once again, if you've ever lived around the DC area, you probably know what I'm talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top