Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am quite flabbergasted by this move. Actually suing a company to make them move from a right to work state back to one with a union. Talk about government interference!
"The agency said Boeing officials had made “coercive statements” to union employees in Everett starting in 2009 that the company would relocate or had relocated work because of strikes".
Sometimes the truth hurts. Doesn't mean you should get sued for it.
Sometimes the truth hurts. Doesn't mean you should get sued for it.
If you are intentionally violating the law, and interfering with any legal right to unionize, not only should you get sued, you should go to jail for it.
It amounts to no more than using company thugs to conduct a criminal conspiracy designed to destroy the rights of the employees.
Do not violate the law and you have no problem. Simple.
I am quite flabbergasted by this move. Actually suing a company to make them move from a right to work state back to one with a union. Talk about government interference!
How is it unfair business practices to open a manufacturing plant in the US? GE has favored corporation status with 0bama, and they have moved jobs over seas.
Actually, there is a fairly well established legal precedent here. I can't remember the details but years ago there was a company whose workforce unionized and they responded by attempting to move their plant to a less union friendly state. The union sued and won, with the courts blocking the company's move.
Not what's going on here. Imagine this, the unions get to veto business decisions of a private company. This is obama's America.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtimer2
Violate the law and suffer the result.
"The agency said Boeing officials had made “coercive statements” to union employees in Everett starting in 2009 that the company would relocate or had relocated work because of strikes".
So...you just take this as FACT? Just because the corrupt union said it, doesn't make it true. Seems business should be able to protect itself from union abuses that damage company operations.
How is it unfair business practices to open a manufacturing plant in the US? GE has favored corporation status with 0bama, and they have moved jobs over seas.
It's not. The issue at hand went completely over your head.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
