Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was written by the editor. Not sure where liar came from. Nancy Reagan went to Charles wedding. Michelle could have gone but I don't think she would have gone even if invited.
I didn't vote for him the first time so what the Brits think of him won't influence my vote anymore than anything else.
Try to get this through your head?
Prince Charles' wedding was the wedding of the heir to the throne. Hence, State Wedding. Hence, heads of government were invited.
Prince William's wedding is not a State Wedding, because he's not the (current) heir to the throne. No heads of government invited. No PMs, no Chancellors, no Presidents who act as heads of government.
Prince Charles' wedding was the wedding of the heir to the throne. Hence, State Wedding. Hence, heads of government were invited.
Prince William's wedding is not a State Wedding, because he's not the (current) heir to the throne. No heads of government invited. No PMs, no Chancellors, no Presidents who act as heads of government.
Is this somehow hard?
I tried posting that earlier, and it went right over the head of the OP. When you are so filled with hate, actual logic, and critical thinking is indeed very hard.
Prince Charles' wedding was the wedding of the heir to the throne. Hence, State Wedding. Hence, heads of government were invited.
Prince William's wedding is not a State Wedding, because he's not the (current) heir to the throne. No heads of government invited. No PMs, no Chancellors, no Presidents who act as heads of government.
Is this somehow hard?
Exactly.
If Queen Elizabeth was "mad" at President Obama, then why would she invite the President and First Lady for a visit in May?
And why would she invite the President and First Lady to stay at Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle if she were "mad" at the Obams?
And why would the Queen of England hold a state dinner in honor of President Obama if she were "mad" at him?
Prince Charles' wedding was the wedding of the heir to the throne. Hence, State Wedding. Hence, heads of government were invited.
Prince William's wedding is not a State Wedding, because he's not the (current) heir to the throne. No heads of government invited. No PMs, no Chancellors, no Presidents who act as heads of government.
Is this somehow hard?
You mean Non-British Commonwealth PM's? Australia's PM was there, as were many other Prime Ministers and Governer Generals from the Commonwealth (We actually had both our PM and GG there).
Last edited by Kangaroofarmer; 04-30-2011 at 01:53 AM..
Was Trump invited, nope, how about Palin, no again, can anyone name one rightwing leader or talkinghead that was invited, no, I wonder why.
Dumbest thread on the board, for the moment.
Casper
You mean Non-British Commonwealth PM's? Australia's PM was there, as were many other Prime Ministers and Governer Generals from the Commonwealth (We actually had both our PM and GG there).
By chance do you know why in Commonwealth realms both the Governor General and the Prime Minister were invited, but in Overseas Territories (ie: Bermuda, Gibraltar, the Cayman Islands, etc) the invitations only went to the Chief Ministers/Premiers and not the Governors? Isent the Governor of a British Overseas Territory the monarch's representative like a Governor General in a Commonwealth realm?
The President and First Lady have been invited by Queen Elizabeth to stay at Buckingham Palace (or Windsor Castle) in May 2011. The Queen will also host a state dinner in President Obama's honor....move on folks, keep it moving, nothing to see here.
btw Obama and his wife were touring the area the tornado hit the day of the wedding. If he had been invited he was better off being at the tornado site anyway.
I cannot find the short vid of Obama on the ground there when he spoke of seeing the aftermath close and up front. I believe he said it was the first time he's seen something like this first hand right after it happened. He came across well. Like him or not he's tons better at this aspect than his predecessor. He's not like the BP guy.
Of course he was there---great photo opportunities should never be wasted. LOL
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
