Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-29-2011, 11:52 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243

Advertisements

Quote:
(CNSNews.com) -- Three people convicted of crimes as a result of a terrorism-related investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) were later naturalized as U.S. citizens by the Obama administration, according to federal auditors.
Can someone please help me out with this one? WHY?!?!?!?!?!

Three Convicted in Terror-Related Cases Later Granted U.S. Citizenship by Obama Administration | CNSnews.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2011, 11:59 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Obama: Winning the Future (WTF)!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Greer
2,213 posts, read 2,843,672 times
Reputation: 1737
They were not convicted of terrorism. The article is vague as to what they specifically were convicted of, but the charges go down as low as "false statements."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:26 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvsteve View Post
They were not convicted of terrorism.
They were convicted of Category II terrorism related crimes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,830,626 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
they were charged with violating other statutes not directly related to terrorism

That's from the article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:29 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Why are we granting any convicts citizenship?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:33 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvsteve View Post
They were not convicted of terrorism. The article is vague as to what they specifically were convicted of, but the charges go down as low as "false statements."
Quote:
The March 2011 audit (released on April 21, 2011) by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), entitled Criminal Alien Statistics: Information on Incarcerations, Arrests and Costs, shows that three individuals were among “defendants where the investigation involved an identified link to international terrorism but they were charged with violating other statutes [not directly related to terrorism], including fraud, immigration, drugs, false statements, and general conspiracy charges,” referred by DOJ as Category II terrorism-related cases.
These look like honorable upstanding people right? Why not naturalize them, they will add much to our dynamics as a prosperous country!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:34 PM
 
46,949 posts, read 25,979,166 times
Reputation: 29441
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Why are we granting any convicts citizenship?
Non-felony convictions? If you've kept your nose clean for 5 years before applying (and you're legally present in the country, of course), it's considered good standing.

From the article, looked like 2 cases of fake ID and one of breaking the rules about transfering funds out of the country - neither of which are hanging offenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:37 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
they were charged with violating other statutes not directly related to terrorism

That's from the article.
It was basically a plea bargain.
From the article:

Quote:
“Prosecuting terror-related targets using Category II offenses and others is often an effective method--and sometimes the only available method--of deterring and disrupting potential terrorist planning and support activities,” explained the DOJ in the document that listed the defendants
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2011, 01:37 PM
 
46,949 posts, read 25,979,166 times
Reputation: 29441
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
These look like honorable upstanding people right? Why not naturalize them, they will add much to our dynamics as a prosperous country!
"charged with". Now look at what they were convicted of. Of course, if we're at the point where being charged with a crime means you should be considered guilty of it, we can save a lot of money on all those pesky trials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top