Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas
By saying nothing he is taking away their State Rights, your logic has a major flaw, or didn't you know that.
Besides the righties have whined on and on about President Obama being for the unions and now he is supposed to support big business over workers, hmmmmm, must more of that right-wing logic 
Casper |
By saying nothing, he's allowing the NLRB to take this case to the courts, where it could be ruled that Boeing may not build in SC. By doing so, the courts would set a precedent (which is what our entire judicial system is based off of) where the government can go up to a business and say "you cannot build in that state because you would not be unionized." In other words, government would be unnecessarily sticking its nose in business again. Perhaps the next time Boeing wants to build something, it will just go overseas and then that's even fewer jobs for Americans.
Why should he support unions over business? If Boeing is allowed to build in SC, then many many people will get jobs. They'll keep more of their money since they won't have to pay mob bosses, Boeing will keep more money since SC is a very business-friendly state, which means they can continue to expand and employ more Americans.
Or they can be told "No!" and be forced to build in WA where they'll have lower profits and their employees will be forced to join a union and lose part of their pay in dues.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
