So waterboarding terrorists is bad, but killing them is good?

[valerie d]

Originally Posted by ChocLot

You are obsessed. Do you really think OBL would allow himself to be taken alive? I'm sure the US would have LOVED to take him to trial before his execution. Unfortunately, OBL refused to surrender. What should have happened then...should the US have left and tried again the next day hoping to catch OBL in a better mood?

I think her entire point just zoomed right over your head!

[1101]

Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy

With what? Neo Progs always go on and on about how wrong water boarding is and that it is torture, a violation of the Geneva Convention, blah, blah, blah, but now they are cheering the killing of this sick puppy. So, which is it; water boarding a terrorist is torture, but murdeingr a terrorist is okay?

And if that idiot GW Bush had done it you'd drape yourself in a flag and wave a bible in the air while singing God Bless America to a nest of Bald Eagles on July 4th ..... * Rolling Eyes * ...... It wiould be perfectly fine if some idiot Texan had done it. Right, sweetheart?

[ovcatto]

Originally Posted by fiveredapples

Notice how Liberals don't even mention the "illegal war" and "war-mongering" talking points when it's Obama as president.

Ah, actually quite a few do. You need to expand your reading list.

[citizenkane2]

Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy

I do fully support both the water boarding and killing of terrorists.

Me too!!

PARTY !!!!