Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-25-2011, 05:37 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,908,341 times
Reputation: 4459

Advertisements

i read the former CEO of vanguard's piece today and have to say that i think he has one valid point regarding taxation:

Is it really fair for gamblers on Wall Street to pay a 15 percent rate when they make a winning investment, and an honest working person — a bricklayer for example — may pay an equal or higher tax on their wages than a gambler? That's absolute absurdity.

Rates may have to be changed, but we also need to look at what is taxed, and how. Dividend income should be taxed at the same rate as ordinary income. As for capital gains, there ought to be some distinction between capital made by people who start businesses, and contribute value to society, and capital made by gamblers on Wall Street, some of whom win. Earned capital income should carry the regular dividend rate, but capital income gains by trading, and particularly short-term trading, should pay a higher tax, even than the present ordinary income rate.


Read more: Bogle: Time for speculators to pay fair tax share - Beaumont Enterprise (http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/business/article/Bogle-Time-for-speculators-to-pay-fair-tax-share-2420385.php#ixzz1hb2li84w - broken link)

look at the numbers:
----our financial system has gone off the rails. It's something we think of as providing capital for new businesses, that will enable people to finance new companies or add to the capital of existing companies. We do that to the tune of about $200 billion a year in financing through Wall Street, or through the financial system. And yet we do some $40 trillion worth of trading every year. I'm selling my investment to you, and you're buying it from me, and it creates no value for society. Indeed, it subtracts value, because the guy in the middle gets his piece.

Many mutual funds turn over 100 percent of their portfolios each year. When I got into this business, it was maybe 18 percent a year. It's amazing.

if the OWS movement was capable of having a point-that should be it-the future is not for gambling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2011, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,414,093 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Everyone? No, the cuts need to be removed because we have to borrow money to make up for the difference.
Or cut spending....or increase taxes on everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:35 PM
 
22,653 posts, read 24,575,170 times
Reputation: 20319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
They need to end the Bush/Obama tax cuts, as that is by far the largest contributor to the problem.

Uh.......no, the year over year deficit is over 1 trillion.........those tax cuts cost around 200 billion.....you do the math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:37 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,384,526 times
Reputation: 55562
dealing with credit card junkies. #1 step--- stop the debting.
then u work on recovery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:41 PM
 
22,653 posts, read 24,575,170 times
Reputation: 20319
[quote=Bostonian123;22265934]who cares what the national debt is.[/quote]

Obviously not our creepy politicians.

Here is the projected national debt

end of 2016 = 20-22 trillion
end of 2025 = 30-33 trillion
end of 2030 = 40-43 trillion

No problem at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2011, 09:46 PM
 
22,653 posts, read 24,575,170 times
Reputation: 20319
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post
i read the former CEO of vanguard's piece today and have to say that i think he has one valid point regarding taxation:

Is it really fair for gamblers on Wall Street to pay a 15 percent rate when they make a winning investment, and an honest working person — a bricklayer for example — may pay an equal or higher tax on their wages than a gambler? That's absolute absurdity.

Rates may have to be changed, but we also need to look at what is taxed, and how. Dividend income should be taxed at the same rate as ordinary income. As for capital gains, there ought to be some distinction between capital made by people who start businesses, and contribute value to society, and capital made by gamblers on Wall Street, some of whom win. Earned capital income should carry the regular dividend rate, but capital income gains by trading, and particularly short-term trading, should pay a higher tax, even than the present ordinary income rate.


Read more: Bogle: Time for speculators to pay fair tax share - Beaumont Enterprise (http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/business/article/Bogle-Time-for-speculators-to-pay-fair-tax-share-2420385.php#ixzz1hb2li84w - broken link)

look at the numbers:
----our financial system has gone off the rails. It's something we think of as providing capital for new businesses, that will enable people to finance new companies or add to the capital of existing companies. We do that to the tune of about $200 billion a year in financing through Wall Street, or through the financial system. And yet we do some $40 trillion worth of trading every year. I'm selling my investment to you, and you're buying it from me, and it creates no value for society. Indeed, it subtracts value, because the guy in the middle gets his piece.

Many mutual funds turn over 100 percent of their portfolios each year. When I got into this business, it was maybe 18 percent a year. It's amazing.

if the OWS movement was capable of having a point-that should be it-the future is not for gambling.

So does that apply to me too??? If I trade stocks with income that HAS ALREADY BEEN TAXED, should Big Brother get a whopping slice so he can blow it on worthless cr*p?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by floridasandy View Post

Is it really fair for gamblers on Wall Street to pay a 15 percent rate when they make a winning investment, and an honest working person — a bricklayer for example — may pay an equal or higher tax on their wages than a gambler? That's absolute absurdity.

The 15% rate is for Long Term Capital gains... so it does not apply to the day traders.

It applies to you and I just like anybody else who holds assets for more than a year. In fact, if you are in a low tax bracket, you will pay ZERO taxes on long term capital gains.

All those Wall Street traders that hold an asset less than a year are paying at regular income tax rates.... probably 35%... NOT 15%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Florida
77,005 posts, read 47,597,802 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Uh.......no, the year over year deficit is over 1 trillion.........those tax cuts cost around 200 billion.....you do the math.
I have already done the math and result was that the cuts are by far the largest reason why the debt skyrockets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Swiftwater, PA
18,780 posts, read 18,121,941 times
Reputation: 14777
I think that we should pimp our politicians to other countries. We might get some money out of it before the other nations find out that they got the wrong end of the stick! We had better make sure we indelibly stamp all of their bottoms with the words: NO RETURNS!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 09:05 AM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I have already done the math and result was that the cuts are by far the largest reason why the debt skyrockets
Math obviously was not your strongest subject then. All it takes is a cursory review of federal revenues and federal spending from 1995-2011 to understand that our problem is SPENDING, not REVENUE.

If you tax more, without the constraints of a balanced budget amendment, the government will just blow it, as they always have. When has the government ever "paid down the debt"? Never.

To ask for more tax revenue without defined, absolute spending limits is lunacy and is just throwing away money. I actually would not mind as much if my taxes were increased (despite already paying $500K) if there was a balanced budget amendment and "surplus" was earmarked to retire debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top