Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:08 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,736,758 times
Reputation: 15667

Advertisements

The government's recent $8,000 cash incentive for first-time home buyers has proved even more costly for recipients than for taxpayers, according to data released Monday. Typical buyers have lost twice as much to price declines as they received from the program.

The median home value fell to about $170,000 in March from $185,000 a year earlier, according to Zillow.com. That means a buyer who closed on a house just before the tax-credit program expired in April 2010 collected $8,000 but has since lost $15,000 in value. Those who bought earlier in the program have done worse; the median price is down $20,000 from March 2009.
"The $8,000 first-time home buyers tax credit . . . has brought many new families into the housing market," the White House boasted in November 2009 upon announcing an extension and expansion of the program. Judging by sales declines since, that seems beyond doubt. Over the past year, the pace of existing home sales has fallen more than 6% and that of new home sales has fallen 22%.

How the $8,000 Tax Credit Cost Home Buyers $15,000 - SmartMoney.com


Another thing: The program didn't work. We squandered taxpayer cash, increased the debt and lured many Americans into losses. We're deeply sorry. We'll try not to repeat the mistake. If anything, in light of America's daunting fiscal challenges, we're going to consider sun-setting costly, existing programs that lure house buyers, like the mortgage interest deduction and capital gains exemption, which together are more than 10 times as expensive as the expired tax credit program, costing about $1,200 per household last year alone."

------------------

On top of this all the IRS was not prepared to handle the tax credit when the time arrived to file for it... Many people requesting the $ 8 K credit were trying to commit fraud and the $ 8 K is mostly used to pay off other bills and not coming into the economy any time soon since it was already spend to buy stuff...another "great" job of Obama and his waste spending advisers!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,937,590 times
Reputation: 7118
I can't think of ONE program of his that has worked.

What a disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,547,540 times
Reputation: 18814
It depends on where you live. People in my area who used the incentive haven't lost anything as home values have either stayed steady or have actually risen. So it is actually not a disaster as Obama haters think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Montgomery Village
4,112 posts, read 4,473,842 times
Reputation: 1712
This would only matter if you planned to flip the house. If you actually wanted to stay and live in it you should be fine. Barring the apocalypse of course. But then, I'd believe you'd have more concerns than the value of your house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:28 AM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,407,529 times
Reputation: 6388
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
It depends on where you live. People in my area who used the incentive haven't lost anything as home values have either stayed steady or have actually risen. So it is actually not a disaster as Obama haters think.
Except that this lottery-like program, along with cash-for-clunkers, took money out of the pockets of people who bought a house or car a week or a month too soon or too late, and arbitrarily enriched those who happened to be needing a car or a house at the right time. It is not equal treatment under the law--but entirely in keeping with Obama's fundamental belief that money is merely a matter of luck.

The side-effects of both were lousy: usable vehicles were crushed, driving up prices for those at the lower end of the market and home prices were arbitrarily inflated for a spell, delaying the market mechanism that would have brought prices to the right level so that a true recovery could begin. It was middle-class welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:33 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
But, but....the government knows best. The government does everything better than the free market. Obama is blessed with wisdom; he didn't need any knowledge of the housing market.....

<sarc.>

Double dip in housing anyone? Obama = WTF


Where is that puking icon when you need it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Undisclosed Bunker
268 posts, read 391,767 times
Reputation: 231
The measly tax credit suckered many into a falling market. The housing crisis is not over. There were one million homes foreclosed on last year and another million expected this year. 14% (and growing)of all homes in the United States are vacant. Even the great savior Obama cannot change the natural law of supply and demand.

Many Obomabot zombies have convinced themselves that although U.S. home values have fallen nearly 7 trillion dollars since 2007, their home is going up in value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 11:55 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,727,118 times
Reputation: 6407
What does a community organizer know about any of this??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,934,056 times
Reputation: 5932
Hmmm, worked for me and guess what my home value did not go down. Maybe those buyers should have been a bit smarter when finding out what their home was really worth before buying. I do not see how one has anyhing to do with the other.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2011, 12:07 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,926,416 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Hmmm, worked for me and guess what my home value did not go down. Maybe those buyers should have been a bit smarter when finding out what their home was really worth before buying. I do not see how one has anyhing to do with the other.
Casper
Connecting the dots is really not difficult. The government created a false 2nd real estate bubble. Just as in the costly "cash for clunkers", it created a demand that didn't exists by offering a financial incentive to seemingly reward a certain behavior it wished to elicit, exactly when it wished to elicit it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top