Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Unless spending is cut. What good will it due to tax ANYBODY if congress continues to spend it faster than it comes in?? It makes no sense at all. 60 trillion in unfunded liabilities. That means we the US have already allocated 60 trillion dollars we don't have in the first place to be spent. That is on top of the 14 trillion dollar national debt. Do you think taxation is the answer? Apparently the orator does. He's an idiot though and just out to get the gullible lemmings vote for going after the evil rich.
Hell the GDP of the entire world was around 65 trillion dollars. When will the insanity end? In riots and flames?
Unless spending is cut. What good will it due to tax ANYBODY if congress continues to spend it faster than it comes in?? It makes no sense at all. 60 trillion in unfunded liabilities. That means we the US have already allocated 60 trillion dollars we don't have in the first place to be spent. That is on top of the 14 trillion dollar national debt. Do you think taxation is the answer? Apparently the orator does. He's an idiot though and just out to get the gullible lemmings vote for going after the evil rich.
Hell the GDP of the entire world was around 65 trillion dollars. When will the insanity end? In riots and flames?
Taxing the rich is PART of the solution, and a LONG WAY from the whole solution.
Taxing the rich is PART of the solution, and a LONG WAY from the whole solution.
Get a clue.
No it's pointless if your going to turn around and spend it right after it comes in which is what they will do. Anything you've seen make you think spending will be reigned in professor plumb??
No it's pointless if your going to turn around and spend it right after it comes in which is what they will do. Anything you've seen make you think spending will be reigned in professor plumb??
But, like dude, what if you're NOT going to spend it right after it comes in? What if you make taxing them a PART of a full plan that also "reins" in spending? Pretty gnarly, eh?
They need a balanced budget amendment to force the cutting of spending.
We need to fire a ton of government employees into the private work force and we need to cut all the social spending down to a lot less with the main concerns only for the disabled and elderly.
The rest of the entitlement minded folks need to grow up.
PS: when the recession hit the first thing you lost was half the so called wealthy, so if you try and fund so much of the budget off their hide you will cause always massive deficits.
Forget share the wealth, share the responsibilities of the debts.
But, like dude, what if you're NOT going to spend it right after it comes in? What if you make taxing them a PART of a full plan that also "reins" in spending? Pretty gnarly, eh?
What do you mean, what if your not going to spend it? its already been spent
What do you mean, what if your not going to spend it? its already been spent
Sadly many are unable to understand where we are. Way too many. All they know is what they're told.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
