Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, but if it was not for all the politics and the current admin trying to slam arzonia, it would have never went to court...
This one of those truly WTF moments.
The case, as has been pointed out, was brought before the Court by the Chamber of Commerce, not the administration. Is it your argument that the Chamber initiated this litigation at the behest of the administration?
Perhaps you would like to explain this other world speculation.
Yes, but if it was not for all the politics and the current admin trying to slam arzonia, it would have never went to court...
Because the US Chambers of Commerce is so supportive of the current administration????
This law affected businesses. The US Chambers of Commerce is a business-oriented lobbying group. They are also very much right-leaning. So, your assertion that it would not have gone to court has no legs. It was destined for the courts the moment it was signed into law.
Such stunts wouldn't possible without the full support of the disingenuous folks such as those found in these forums. Their priority is not about debating issues and getting to solutions. It is all about who they want to put in office, at any cost.
The case, as has been pointed out, was brought before the Court by the Chamber of Commerce, not the administration. Is it your argument that the Chamber initiated this litigation at the behest of the administration?
Perhaps you would like to explain this other world speculation.
Nope, nothing but my speculation...why should I need anymore? That's what the left say anyway....
My whole argument is, (DC at the Ridge) said the door was wide open...I asked "if the door was wide open, then why the court case?" If the door is WIDE open....which DC at the Ridge agreed with me, saying the court agreed...so again why bring it to court?
So you think that the current admin had nothing to do with taking Arizona to court?
Because the US Chambers of Commerce is so supportive of the current administration????
This law affected businesses. The US Chambers of Commerce is a business-oriented lobbying group. They are also very much right-leaning. So, your assertion that it would not have gone to court has no legs. It was destined for the courts the moment it was signed into law.
Then how can the door be wide open? If it was destined to go to court as soon as it was signed?
Such stunts wouldn't possible without the full support of the disingenuous folks such as those found in these forums. Their priority is not about debating issues and getting to solutions. It is all about who they want to put in office, at any cost.
If Obozo was so concerned about immigration reform why didn't he pass it through reconciliation? He did it when he couldn't get the votes to pass Obozocare.
If Obozo was so concerned about immigration reform why didn't he pass it through reconciliation? He did it when he couldn't get the votes to pass Obozocare.
If immigration reform was that important it would have been done.
Obamacare got done should be proof enough.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
