Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But they are often not. Many of them want to rewrite constitutional history to do away with the seperation of church and state.
Well to be fair, adding amendments to the constitution to ban same-sex marriage, etc. is perfectly legal. You could add an amendment that requires all cows to be painted with pepto bismol pink if you wanted to.
However, what I'm saying is that they are very very literal in their interpretation of the current constitution.
Well to be fair, adding amendments to the constitution to ban same-sex marriage, etc. is perfectly legal. You could add an amendment that requires all cows to be painted with pepto bismol pink if you wanted to.
However, what I'm saying is that they are very very literal in their interpretation of the current constitution.
What, you think the Constitution is allegory?
Get a brain.
literal |ˈlitərəl; ˈlitrəl|
adjective
taking words in their usual or most basic sense without metaphor or allegory
I'm not sure that I understand the correlation or why it matters. What I'm curious about is why one would take anything but a literal interpretation of the limited and enumerated powers of the Federal Government.
If there's no limit on their power, what keeps us free?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.