Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana
It's Beck and his acolytes that have made "progressive" a four letter word.
|
its not beck
its history
hilter and mussolini were progressives
the progressive movement started in the 1880's
its the movement of marx, and engle..its the root of socialism, and fascism
Progressivism is a self destructive force that is created to oppose the principles of
1. individual rights
2. personal liberty
3. free speech
4. free commerce
5. minimal interference from the federal government
In short, the progressive movement goal is to create a world similar to "1984", in which the populace are serfs and the government is the only entity that matters. Liberals and progressives pine to sacrifice thier personal freedom for the "comfort" and "security" they feel can be provided by the state. It is the road to slavery and is currently walked and promoted by fools who have digested the propaganda. It is much like the "worker's paradise" promised by Lenin and Stalin as well as the "people's state" of Castro. Wonderful places to live, huh? They bought into the same lines of BS from the progressives.
How about reading “Brave New World” again…..Better yet, “1984″, to get a better taste of the future. Or try something more modern view the German film, “The Lives of Others”.
The same American Left is censoring the word “Marxist” when describing the Marxist agenda of the Obama administration. In a recent brief discussion with a thoughful and usually deep thinking conservative, he bristled at the idea that one should use such a negative term to describe the Obama crowd…..he and others preferred “Social Democrats”….the word Dennis Prager prefers to identify those who wish to replace individual liberties, private enterprise, social, art, language, education, entertainments, television and otherwise, publishing, editing, writing of any kind, and the rest of human life, activity and expression under the aegis of government micromanagement.
"The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into smaller states and all-national isolation, not only to bring the nations closer to each other, but also to merge them." .....Joseph Stalin
"We cannot leap into world government through one quick step.... The precondition for eventual and genuine globalization is progressive regionalization because by that we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units." .....Zbigniew Brzezinski (advisor to Carter, bush1, clinton and obama)
"...in Brzezinski's BETWEEN TWO AGES (1970), he praised Marxism, and he claimed that "the nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty." One aspect of American sovereignty that is being yielded is ownership of American companies by Americans. In the first 9 months of 2007, 69 companies in New England alone have been sold to foreign buyers. Nationally, the French company Alcatel bought Lucent Technologies in the U.S., and in September 2007 announced it will be cutting thousands of jobs.
"We cannot leap into world government through one quick step.... The precondition for eventual and genuine globalization is progressive regionalization because by that we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units." .....Zbigniew Brzezinski (advisor to Carter, bush1, clinton and obama)
Article Six of the U.S. Constitution states that 'all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.'
Because international treaties supercede national law, Fast Track has allowed an enormous restructuring of U.S. law without resorting to a Constitutional convention.... As a result, national sovereignty of the United States has been severely compromised.....the NAU is coming....
March 15, 2010
In an interview with Rachel Maddow Thursday evening, Pelosi asked Americans to "think" about a bright, new, liberating kind of utopia:
""Think of an economy where people could be an artist or a photographer, a writer without worrying about keeping their day job in order to have health insurance. Or that people could start a business and be entrepreneurial and take risks, but not be job-locked because of a condition. You name it, any condition is job-locking.""
and compare it with this:
"“As soon as the distribution of labor comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity, which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood; while in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic.”"...........Carl Marx, in 1846
interesting
the problem here isnt your view of 'progressiveness' its the politicians that your 'party' supports
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
