Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just what we need to solve our problems - a president deciding which unionized companies to save and which non-unionized companies to let go under. That's what the constitution says a president is supposed to do, right?
Millions of Americans can go to hell if they're a part of union(s)? Being out of touch with the reality is fine, as long as you're not the one making decisions.
Millions of Americans can go to hell if they're a part of union(s)? Being out of touch with the reality is fine, as long as you're not the one making decisions.
And that pretty much sums up why things AREN'T so fine, doesn't it?
Millions of Americans can go to hell if they're a part of union(s)? Being out of touch with the reality is fine, as long as you're not the one making decisions.
Excuse me? Why would they go to hell...or anywhere else? Do they need a union in order to work? Are they going to all of a sudden lose their job because the apparatus of the corrupt union is no more?
On top of the fact that unions have a nonstop history of corruption and murder that would make everybody from Vito Corleone to Jimmy Hoffa to Tony Soprano extremely jealous, and are state-of-the-art job and municipality killing machines, a la Detroit?
Millions of Americans can go to hell if they're a part of union(s)? Being out of touch with the reality is fine, as long as you're not the one making decisions.
Government managing the economy is what got us into this mess and is what stops us from being more successful. Government does not create jobs. It creates debt.
On top of the fact that unions have a nonstop history of corruption and murder that would make everybody from Vito Corleone to Jimmy Hoffa to Tony Soprano extremely jealous, and are state-of-the-art job and municipality killing machines, a la Detroit?
You clearly don't know labor history. Business owners used to (and maybe still do) hire thugs to murder and intimidate workers who would try to organize.
In addition, they bribed mayors who would send the police to use violence against union activists.
But the entire argument that unions have anything to do with today's unemployment is baseless. There was lower unemployment when union membership was higher.
You clearly don't know labor history. Business owners used to (and maybe still do) hire thugs to murder and intimidate workers who would try to organize.
In addition, they bribed mayors who would send the police to use violence against union activists.
But the entire argument that unions have anything to do with today's unemployment is baseless. There was lower unemployment when union membership was higher.
Do you live in the land of "opposite of truth"?
Your precious unions have never done anything questionable or illegal?
Try for once to be truthful.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
