Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2011, 09:18 AM
 
2,541 posts, read 2,738,358 times
Reputation: 492

Advertisements

Obamacare does not do anything except drive up the cost of healthcare. It does not address the fundamental issue of ever increasing private healthcare costs.

"Single-payer is a term used to describe a type of financing system. It refers to one entity acting as administrator, or “payer.” In the case of healthcare, a single-payer system would be setup such that one entity—a government run organization—would collect all healthcare fees, and pay out all healthcare costs.

In the current US system, there are literally tens of thousands of different healthcare organizations—HMOs, billing agencies, etc. By having so many different payers of healthcare fees, there is an enormous amount of administrative waste generated in the system. (Just imagine how complex billing must be in a doctor’s office, when each insurance company requires a different form to be completed, has a different billing system, different billing contacts and phone numbers—it’s very confusing.)

In a single-payer system, all hospitals, doctors, and other healthcare providers would bill one entity for their services. This alone reduces administrative waste greatly, and saves money, which can be used to provide care and insurance to those who currently don’t have it."


What is Single-Payer? – Healthcare-NOW!

 
Old 06-06-2011, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,778,277 times
Reputation: 24863
This is exactly my objection to President Obama's proposal. It would still allow private monopolistic corporations, with excessive administrative and executive compensation costs, to set prices high enough to still make a profit. Why should the sick have to pay for all these seperate systems when the job could be done by a bunch of GS-12 clerks with a really big computerized database? Like to one handling Medicare or Veteran's pensions?

Last edited by GregW; 06-06-2011 at 10:47 AM..
 
Old 06-06-2011, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
the advocates for singlepayer still wont answer one question


where are you going to get the 2-5 trillion dollars A YEAR to pay for singlepayer
 
Old 06-06-2011, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the advocates for singlepayer still wont answer one question


where are you going to get the 2-5 trillion dollars A YEAR to pay for singlepayer
NHS (UK) costs about $200 Billion/year to cover 55 million people, of all ages. Given that, in proportion, a similar system would cost $1.2 Trillion in the USA. Under the current system, the governments (federal and states) is spending over a trillion dollar already ($1.029 Trillion in 2010), and to cover only a small fraction of the population.

Doing so would eliminate the need for businesses to spend billions they do on providing health care coverage to employees. Instead, they can always pay a fraction of those costs in taxes towards single payer system, and take the savings to invest in their businesses. It is a win-win for them, and for people not having to rely on employers to provide health care insurance.
 
Old 06-06-2011, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
NHS (UK) costs about $200 Billion/year to cover 55 million people, of all ages. Given that, in proportion, a similar system would cost $1.2 Trillion in the USA. Under the current system, the governments (federal and states) is spending over a trillion dollar already ($1.029 Trillion in 2010), and to cover only a small fraction of the population.

Doing so would eliminate the need for businesses to spend billions they do on providing health care coverage to employees. Instead, they can always pay a fraction of those costs in taxes towards single payer system, and take the savings to invest in their businesses. It is a win-win for them, and for people not having to rely on employers to provide health care insurance.
and mediciad (our quazi singlepayer) costs 320 billion FEDERALLY (plus what the states pay) to cover less than 35 million people

also the average salary for a nurse in europe is about 18-25k( just over what we would call poverty)...while here in the states the average salary for a nurse is 40k-70k

yes businesses would love to see a singlepayer..they would save bunches of money..the person to get screwed would be the workingclass taxpayer who is trying to earn a living while getting taxed to death
 
Old 06-06-2011, 10:38 AM
 
6,565 posts, read 14,294,655 times
Reputation: 3229
Yup, the Health Care Bill didn't go anywhere near far enough...
 
Old 06-06-2011, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
and mediciad (our quazi singlepayer) costs 320 billion FEDERALLY (plus what the states pay) to cover less than 35 million people

also the average salary for a nurse in europe is about 18-25k( just over what we would call poverty)...while here in the states the average salary for a nurse is 40k-70k

yes businesses would love to see a singlepayer..they would save bunches of money..the person to get screwed would be the workingclass taxpayer who is trying to earn a living while getting taxed to death
I don't know about a nurse, but my brother-in-law, a doctor, does just fine and is more than happy to be working in the UK.

Now, your fantastic idea about getting taxed to death is amusing. If anything, continue the good old days you can't live without, I see, is the perfect ticket to death for this country and future generations.

Again... the US governments already spend over a trillion dollar a year to provide health care to a fraction of the populace, or about 40% of the total health care costs.
 
Old 06-06-2011, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I don't know about a nurse, but my brother-in-law, a doctor, does just fine and is more than happy to be working in the UK.

Now, your fantastic idea about getting taxed to death is amusing. If anything, continue the good old days you can't live without, I see, is the perfect ticket to death for this country and future generations.

Again... the US governments already spend over a trillion dollar a year to provide health care to a fraction of the populace, or about 40% of the total health care costs.
why should the GOVERNMENT or any BUSINESS(insurance) spend on YOUR health bill...IS IT NOT your body,, your health..then it should be your bill...pay for the service rendered...or are you against personal responsibility???
 
Old 06-06-2011, 10:46 AM
 
1,027 posts, read 824,754 times
Reputation: 218
Obama's plan will lead to single payer.

You cant just jump there by snapping your fingers.
 
Old 06-06-2011, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
why should the GOVERNMENT or any BUSINESS(insurance) spend on YOUR health bill...IS IT NOT your body,, your health..then it should be your bill...pay for the service rendered...or are you against personal responsibility???
You don't have to have insurance. You should pay cash. Do you?

"Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Gandhi
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top