Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
you really do pick and choose don't you? sure there are illnesses that can be tested for before viability but a good deal can not. again you need to get educated. trisomy can be detected till 16 to 20 weeks. amniocentesis is done around the 15h week or more. you may not want to believe it but there are legit medical reasons why women have late term abortions
Ok Dr. Here is some date on CVS and trisomy 21. What other trisomys are of concern to you. Needless to say, you are once again wrong.
Does the Government have ANY business involving itself in the abortion issue?
Yes, it does.
Two human beings are implicated in every abortion: the mother and her unborn child
In an abortion, the mother usually contracts a doctor to kill her child. The child has the natural right to life; this is violated in every abortion by the mother and doctor contracting to kill and depriving it of life.
One of the purposes of government is to protect the natural rights of human beings from those who would violate them. This is a proposition that I think nobody in this forum would argue with.
Therefore, the government can and should "have business involving itself in the abortion issue".
Interesting how the so called “Pro Choice” crowd denies the unborn child a choice !?
Should the Government be involved ? Let’s see, if you crack open an egg from a Bald Eagle the Government will put you in prison. On the other hand, you can flush unborn babies down the toilet if you feel the baby will be a financial burden. Hmmmm. Oh, and you shouldn’t be burdened with the cost. The tax payer will chip in weather he or she wants to or not.
Perhaps if a fetus could be given a choice.....it would choose to go to be with GOD in HEAVEN, rather than live a life of misery here on this earth because it was never wanted in the first place.
Last time I checked, human beings weren't an endangered species. And....if the mother can't afford to care for an unwanted child, the tax payer WILL chip in for the cost of raising it for 18 years, whether he or she wants to or not.
We are truly a sick society.
I assume you are referring to all of those Republican/conservative pro-lifers out there that want to cut benefits and health care for children of the poor.
Or keep your cloths on.
Gee.....I wonder why no one has ever thought of that before? We should tell all those people in third world countries full of starving children that we have found the solution!
Anything other than the life of the mother is a frivolous reason.
it is ok with you a mother who doesn't want to go through the trauma of having a severely deformed baby that will die a slow terrible death be forced to do so?
Ok Dr. Here is some date on CVS and trisomy 21. What other trisomys are of concern to you. Needless to say, you are once again wrong.
you can research yourself if you truly want to know. you seem to dismiss the issues anyway. trisomy is only a few of the many issues that can be a reason for late term abortion.
Anything other than the life of the mother is a frivolous reason.
You never answered my question.
Why would you want to force a woman to give birth to a hideously deformed baby......just so it can suffer and struggle to breath for a few minutes, hours or maybe a day or two? Do you call such suffering "frivolous"?
Please....tell us your reasoning. Why is that a GOOD thing? Why would you condone such unnecessary suffering.....by both the parents who have to watch the torture and the infant experiencing it?
Is it because YOUR God requires such an infant to suffer before he will allow it to enter "Heaven"?
Why would you want to force a woman to give birth to a hideously deformed baby......just so it can suffer and struggle to breath for a few minutes, hours or maybe a day or two? Do you call such suffering "frivolous"?
Please....tell us your reasoning. Why is that a GOOD thing? Why would you condone such unnecessary suffering.....by both the parents who have to watch the torture and the infant experiencing it?
Is it because YOUR God requires such an infant to suffer before he will allow it to enter "Heaven"?
I'm an atheist so it ain't a God reason. Are you suggesting only deformed babies are aborted after viability? No one can predict with any certainty what will happen after birth. What make you think any parent has to watch anything. You abortion crazed folks are a little unhinged.
A nonviable fetus is nothing more than an organism....not a baby....not a child.
An organism is NOT a person....it has NO rights, let alone the right to take over a woman's life and body against her will.
What constitutes personhood.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.